From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
To: Amos Kong <akong@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, aliguori@us.ibm.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, quintela@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-trivial] [RESEND PATCH 1/3] socket: remove redundant check
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 11:50:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120801105011.GC17816@stefanha-thinkpad.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1343811543-12137-2-git-send-email-akong@redhat.com>
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 04:59:01PM +0800, Amos Kong wrote:
> It's aleady in the end of loop, error should be set.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amos Kong <akong@redhat.com>
> ---
> qemu-sockets.c | 4 +---
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/qemu-sockets.c b/qemu-sockets.c
> index 668fa93..c636882 100644
> --- a/qemu-sockets.c
> +++ b/qemu-sockets.c
> @@ -181,9 +181,7 @@ int inet_listen_opts(QemuOpts *opts, int port_offset, Error **errp)
> fprintf(stderr,"%s: bind(%s,%s,%d): %s\n", __FUNCTION__,
> inet_strfamily(e->ai_family), uaddr, inet_getport(e),
> strerror(errno));
> - if (!e->ai_next) {
> - error_set(errp, QERR_SOCKET_BIND_FAILED);
> - }
> + error_set(errp, QERR_SOCKET_BIND_FAILED);
> }
> }
> closesocket(slisten);
This isn't obvious. It looks like the intent of the if (!e->ai_next) is
to suppress the error so that the next iteration of the *outer* loop can
succeed.
Why is it okay to set QERR_SOCKET_BIND_FAILED? We may have more
addrinfos left to try in the outer loop. They may succeed so we don't
want an error in that case.
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-01 10:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-17 15:45 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] trivial fix of qemu-sockets.c Amos Kong
2012-07-17 15:45 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] socket: remove redundant check Amos Kong
2012-07-17 15:45 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] remove unused include of error.h Amos Kong
2012-08-01 8:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [RESEND PATCH 0/3] trivial fix of qemu-sockets.c Amos Kong
2012-08-01 8:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [RESEND PATCH 1/3] socket: remove redundant check Amos Kong
2012-08-01 10:50 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2012-08-01 11:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-trivial] " Peter Maydell
2012-08-01 11:50 ` Markus Armbruster
2012-08-01 11:48 ` Markus Armbruster
2012-08-03 2:59 ` Amos Kong
2012-08-01 8:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [RESEND PATCH 2/3] remove unused include of error.h Amos Kong
2012-08-01 8:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [RESEND PATCH 3/3] socket: clean up redundant assignment Amos Kong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120801105011.GC17816@stefanha-thinkpad.localdomain \
--to=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=akong@redhat.com \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-trivial@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).