From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44658) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SwvS6-0004Z2-L8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 09:28:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SwvS2-0002ee-J3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 09:28:34 -0400 Received: from paradis.irqsave.net ([109.190.18.76]:55871) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SwvS2-0002e8-Ap for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 09:28:30 -0400 Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 15:28:24 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Beno=EEt?= Canet Message-ID: <20120802132824.GC14624@irqsave.net> References: <1343902604-13981-1-git-send-email-benoit@irqsave.net> <501A7DEF.5000401@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <501A7DEF.5000401@redhat.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 00/12] Qorum disk image corruption resiliency List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Beno=EEt?= Canet , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com Le Thursday 02 Aug 2012 =E0 07:17:35 (-0600), Eric Blake a =E9crit : > How does this fit with snapshots? Does a snapshot of a quorum require > passing in three filenames, one for each of the three sources? For now quorum lives on top of qcow*/qed it doesn't fit well with snapsho= t: it a step before turning it in a block filter. When the QEMU block filter infrastructure will be done (and I am willing = to help it happen) quorum will live on top of raw files and below qcow*/qed this way snapshot should work fine. Beno=EEt >=20 > --=20 > Eric Blake eblake@redhat.com +1-919-301-3266 > Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org >=20