From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44253) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SzTz0-0002fO-8C for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 10:45:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SzTyv-0008Q0-9M for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 10:45:06 -0400 From: Paul Brook Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 15:44:41 +0100 References: <1344519084-21847-1-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> <87hascw42n.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <201208091544.44112.paul@codesourcery.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/23] Suppress unused default drives List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Evgeny Voevodin , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Markus Armbruster , Peter Crosthwaite , Max Filippov , "Edgar E. Iglesias" , Igor Mitsyanko , Alexander Graf , Andreas =?utf-8?q?F=C3=A4rber?= , =?utf-8?q?Herv=C3=A9_Poussineau?= , Maksim Kozlov , Stefano Stabellini , Jan Kiszka , Blue Swirl , Anthony Liguori , Mark Langsdorf , Michael Walle , qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Dmitry Solodkiy , Peter Chubb , Aurelien Jarno > > *can* use it for something entirely else, if=sd notwithstanding: > > (qemu) device_add lsi > > (qemu) device_add scsi-cd,drive=sd0 > > If/when we get a PCI SD card controller model, would all the PCI > using machines need to be added to take the 'no default sd card' > setting out again, or does it get overridden anyway if you say > "and I'd like an sd controller"? For SD cards we shouldn't need this to start with. Why are we creating SD cards when there's no host controller to connect them to? Surely we shold be able to figure that out automatically. Especially important for board variants with multiple SD interfaces. Is this all a hangover from before we have proper -drive options? Paul