From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Carsten Otte <cotte@de.ibm.com>,
Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] s390/kvm: Add a channel I/O based virtio transport driver.
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 13:03:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120814130334.79ba51b5@BR9GNB5Z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ipcms59i.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:40:01 +0930
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:56:38 +0200, Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 13:52:57 +0930
> > Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 7 Aug 2012 16:52:47 +0200, Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > 1) Please don't limit yourself to 32 feature bits! If you look at how
> > > virtio_mmio does it, they use a selector to index into a
> > > theoretically-infinite array of feature bits:
> >
> > It should be easy to extend the data processed by the feature ccws to a
> > feature/index combination. Would it be practical to limit the index to
> > an 8 bit value?
>
> 256 feature bits? That seems like it could one day be limiting. Or an
> 8 bit accessor into feature words? 8192 seems enough for anyone sane.
An 8 bit accessor. I hope everybody stays on the sane side :)
>
> > > Note that we're also speculating a move to a new vring format, which
> > > will probably be little-endian. But you probably want a completely new
> > > ccw code for that anyway.
> >
> > Do you have a pointer to that discussion handy?
> >
> > If the host may support different vring formats, I'll probably want to
> > add some kind of discovery mechanism for that as well (what discovery
> > mechanism depends on whether this would be per-device or per-machine).
>
> It would be per-machine; per-device would be a bit crazy. We'd
> deprecate the old ring format.
>
> There's been no consistent thread on the ideas for a ring change,
> unfortunately, but you can find interesting parts here, off this thread:
>
> Message-ID: <8762gj6q5r.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
> Subject: Re: [RFC 7/11] virtio_pci: new, capability-aware driver.
I've read a bit through this and it looks like this is really virtio-2
or so. How about discoverability by the guest? Guests will likely have
to support both formats, and forcing them to look at the feature bits
for each device in order to figure out the queue format feels wrong if
it is going to be the same format for the whole machine anyway.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-14 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-07 14:52 [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/4] s390: virtio-ccw guest kernel support Cornelia Huck
2012-08-07 14:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] s390/kvm: Handle hosts not supporting s390-virtio Cornelia Huck
2012-08-09 10:03 ` Avi Kivity
2012-08-09 10:41 ` Cornelia Huck
2012-08-10 8:42 ` Heiko Carstens
2012-08-10 11:03 ` Cornelia Huck
2012-08-09 23:09 ` Alexander Graf
2012-08-10 7:45 ` Cornelia Huck
2012-08-07 14:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] s390: Add a mechanism to get the subchannel id Cornelia Huck
2012-08-13 17:16 ` Sebastian Ott
2012-08-14 8:52 ` Sebastian Ott
2012-08-14 10:38 ` Cornelia Huck
2012-08-14 10:53 ` Sebastian Ott
2012-08-07 14:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] s390/kvm: Add a channel I/O based virtio transport driver Cornelia Huck
2012-08-08 4:22 ` Rusty Russell
2012-08-13 8:56 ` Cornelia Huck
2012-08-14 0:10 ` Rusty Russell
2012-08-14 11:03 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2012-08-15 3:15 ` Rusty Russell
2012-08-14 19:56 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-08-15 7:28 ` Rusty Russell
2012-08-15 7:48 ` Christian Borntraeger
2012-08-21 5:35 ` Rusty Russell
2012-08-07 14:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] s390/kvm: Split out early console code Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120814130334.79ba51b5@BR9GNB5Z \
--to=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cotte@de.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).