From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60206) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T1S3x-0000YC-KA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 21:06:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T1S3w-0001pP-E6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 21:06:21 -0400 Received: from e23smtp08.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.141]:53803) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T1S3v-0001m7-SS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 21:06:20 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e23smtp08.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 11:06:01 +1000 Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 11:05:32 +1000 From: David Gibson Message-ID: <20120815010532.GE8136@truffula.fritz.box> References: <1344391839-2006-1-git-send-email-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> <502A45ED.6060507@suse.de> <502A4B0B.4070105@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <502A4B0B.4070105@suse.de> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [0/10] pseries updates and cleanups List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexander Graf Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 02:56:43PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote: > On 08/14/2012 02:34 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: > >On 08/08/2012 04:10 AM, David Gibson wrote: > >>Hi Alex, > >> > >>This series contains all my outstanding pseries updates which aren't > >>dependent on getting a generic patch upstream first. I have a number > >>more which are actually more urgent to get into 1.2, but we need to > >>get some word on the generic patches before I can really push those. > >> > >>In the meantime, if you could pull these various updates and cleanups > >>into ppc-next ready for the 1.2 freeze, that would be great. > > > >Thanks, applied all to ppc-next. > > I also went manually through the queue and fixed up the authors of a > few patches to reflect the first person in the sob line. Pretty > annoying. Ah. That may or may not have been the right thing. I thought I'd gone through and corrected those patches where the author got clobbered by git citool --amend, but it's possible I missed some. On the other hand there were some where I deliberately left the author as myself because although the person in the first S-o-b wrote an initial version - or an initial piece, I'd essentially rewritten the patch later. I'm not really sure what the right protocol is in cases like that. -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson