From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52525) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T3gii-00027v-SL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 01:09:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T3gih-00023c-RY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 01:09:40 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:18311) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T3gih-00023M-Ja for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 01:09:39 -0400 Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 10:39:05 +0530 From: Amit Shah Message-ID: <20120821050905.GE29197@amit.redhat.com> References: <20120724023657.6600.52706.stgit@ltc189.sdl.hitachi.co.jp> <20120809101620.GN3280@amit.redhat.com> <87393h3s5v.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87393h3s5v.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/6] virtio-trace: Support virtio-trace List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Rusty Russell Cc: Arnd Bergmann , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Frederic Weisbecker , Yoshihiro YUNOMAE , yrl.pp-manager.tt@hitachi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, Herbert Xu , "Franch Ch. Eigler" , Ingo Molnar , Mathieu Desnoyers , Steven Rostedt , Anthony Liguori , Greg Kroah-Hartman On (Tue) 21 Aug 2012 [11:47:16], Rusty Russell wrote: > On Thu, 9 Aug 2012 15:46:20 +0530, Amit Shah wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On (Tue) 24 Jul 2012 [11:36:57], Yoshihiro YUNOMAE wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > > > The following patch set provides a low-overhead system for collecting kernel > > > tracing data of guests by a host in a virtualization environment. > > > > So I just have one minor comment, please post a non-RFC version of the > > patch. > > > > Since you have an ACK from Steven for the ftrace patch, I guess Rusty > > can push this in via his virtio tree? > > > > I'll ack the virtio-console bits in the next series you send. > > You didn't Ack, BTW. At least, AFAICT. Ah, sorry. Will do that now. Amit