From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
To: Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: desi babu <vdesibabu@yahoo.com>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-ga : Guest Agent : Windows 2008 : Unknown command guest-fsfreeze-freeze
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 09:58:52 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120821095852.29a392c3@doriath.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120820193434.GN16157@illuin>
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 14:34:34 -0500
Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:54:29AM -0300, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 10:11:29 -0700 (PDT)
> > desi babu <vdesibabu@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Guest-Agent : Windows 2008 Error : Relase 1.1.90
> > >
> > > error : internal error unable to execute QEMU command 'guest-fsfreeze-freeze': this feature or command is not currently supported.
> >
> > That's correct, fsfreze is not supported on Windows.
> >
> > > Guest-info shows the command is available. Is there any information available on the list of commands supported inside Windows ? Appreciate if you have any pointers.
> >
> > That's a qemu-ga bug. CC'ing Michael to check if he has a fix in mind for this.
> >
>
> I've been thinking about this one for a while. It's considered expected
> behavior, but I realize it sucks for discoverability. I doubt we want to
> do platform-specific QAPI schema definitions, so the only option I can
> think of is some kind of [de-]registration mechanism where we can mark
> commands as being not available for a particular build/platform in the
> cases where we stub out command implementations.
Yes, I guess the first idea I had is similar. I thought about adding
PlatformOps and let win32 and posix register the commands they
implement. Then, qmp_guest_info() could check if the in-use PlatformOps
supports the command before adding it to the supported list.
> I think we can expose this to existing clients by no longer listing commands
> marked as unsupported in the list provided by the guest-info command. It
> should "just work". Can probably do it for 1.3. For now, clients will
> have to catch it in the error-handling path.
Agreed it's 1.3 material.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-21 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-17 17:11 [Qemu-devel] qemu-ga : Guest Agent : Windows 2008 : Unknown command guest-fsfreeze-freeze desi babu
2012-08-20 13:54 ` Luiz Capitulino
2012-08-20 19:34 ` Michael Roth
2012-08-21 12:58 ` Luiz Capitulino [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120821095852.29a392c3@doriath.home \
--to=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=vdesibabu@yahoo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).