From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>,
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-1.2] qed: refuse unaligned zero writes with a backing file
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 08:53:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120829075353.GA26390@stefanha-thinkpad.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <503CD463.80009@redhat.com>
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 04:23:31PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 28/08/2012 15:37, Stefan Hajnoczi ha scritto:
> >> > The "right fix" would not be much more complex though, something like this, right?
> >> > (untested).
> > Yes but it's more complicated. To do a really good job we should
> > slice off the first/last clusters if they are unaligned, handle them
> > like regular allocating writes, and handle the middle of the request
> > as a zero write.
> >
> > I decided to do the simplest implementation since this scenario only
> > occurs in test cases, not real guests.
>
> Yes, I was curious because it reminded me of the patch I did to write
> zeroes when I was playing with discard to avoid the large bounce buffer
> in qed_aio_write_inplace. That patch takes care of processing clusters
> one by one (though that means one L2 write for each and every cluster,
> not just the first and last).
>
> It probably causes a performance hit, but anyway I attach it for
> completeness.
Thanks for sharing. I think this patch could be used as the basis for
something that handles the first and last clusters one-at-a-time and
does the middle clusters in a single L2 update.
I'm not going to implement that right now because I prefer the simple
solution unless this code path becomes more used.
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-29 7:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-28 13:04 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-1.2] qed: refuse unaligned zero writes with a backing file Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-08-28 13:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-08-28 13:37 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-08-28 14:23 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-08-29 7:53 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2012-08-29 9:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-08-28 13:38 ` Kevin Wolf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120829075353.GA26390@stefanha-thinkpad.localdomain \
--to=stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).