From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43857) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T79vD-00023T-QU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 14:56:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T79vC-0000Ep-RA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 14:56:55 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:14110) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T79vC-0000EN-IB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 14:56:54 -0400 Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 20:56:49 +0200 From: Igor Mammedov Message-ID: <20120830205649.79778ec1@thinkpad.mammed.net> In-Reply-To: <503FB4B6.3080107@profihost.ag> References: <503F2D0D.8010606@profihost.ag> <503F89C0.3000405@suse.de> <3ABCDF63-4686-483B-AC17-6A09BFD9C773@profihost.ag> <503F9827.5080608@suse.de> <503FA182.3090601@profihost.ag> <20120830204016.7fffb997@thinkpad.mammed.net> <503FB4B6.3080107@profihost.ag> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] CPU hotplug List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Priebe Cc: Bo Yang , qemu-devel , Andreas =?ISO-8859-1?B?RuRyYmVy?= , Bruce Rogers On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 20:45:10 +0200 Stefan Priebe wrote: > Am 30.08.2012 20:40, schrieb Igor Mammedov: > >>>> Am 30.08.2012 um 17:41 schrieb Andreas F=E4rber : > >>>> > >>>>> Am 30.08.2012 11:06, schrieb Stefan Priebe: > >>>>>> I tried latest 1.2rc1 kvm-qemu with vanilla kernel v3.5.2 but the = VM > >>>>>> just crashes when sending cpu_set X online through qm monitor. > >>>>> > >>>>> For SLES we're carrying a patch by Kamalesh Babulal that prevents t= his > >>>>> (BNC#747339). > >>>> > >>>> But this just disables CPU [hotplug] and does Not fix it? > >>> > >>> It fixes the crash. Hotplug needs to be implemented first, and this h= as > >>> been taking several months already (for x86, to be specific). > >> > >> Mhm RHEL 6.3 claims to support this? > > it's not officially supported, it's just tech-preview. That allows to p= lay with > > hotplug and uncover possible guest issues early. >=20 > Yes, but does this mean that is doesn't work at RHEL too? i wasn't able=20 > to get it working any guest or host at all. It works with RHEL 6.3 host/guest combo. Extra testing is greatly appreciat= ed.=20 > Greets, > Stefan >=20 --=20 Regards, Igor