From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qapi: Fix potential NULL pointer segfault
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 13:52:32 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120903135232.14a42e3a@doriath.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5044DFB2.4020206@weilnetz.de>
On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 18:49:54 +0200
Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de> wrote:
> Am 03.09.2012 18:34, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
> > On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 08:57:36 +0200
> > Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Il 01/09/2012 09:30, Stefan Weil ha scritto:
> >>> Report from smatch:
> >>>
> >>> qapi-visit.c:1640 visit_type_BlockdevAction(8) error:
> >>> we previously assumed 'obj' could be null (see line 1639)
> >>> qapi-visit.c:2432 visit_type_NetClientOptions(8) error:
> >>> we previously assumed 'obj' could be null (see line 2431)
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
> >>> ---
> >>> scripts/qapi-visit.py | 2 +-
> >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/scripts/qapi-visit.py b/scripts/qapi-visit.py
> >>> index 2afc5c0..1a669f3 100644
> >>> --- a/scripts/qapi-visit.py
> >>> +++ b/scripts/qapi-visit.py
> >>> @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ void visit_type_%(name)s(Visitor *m, %(name)s ** obj, const char *name, Error **
> >>> if (!error_is_set(errp)) {
> >>> visit_start_struct(m, (void **)obj, "%(name)s", name, sizeof(%(name)s), &err);
> >>> if (!err) {
> >>> - if (!obj || *obj) {
> >>> + if (obj && *obj) {
> >>> visit_type_%(name)sKind(m, &(*obj)->kind, "type", &err);
> >>> if (!err) {
> >>> switch ((*obj)->kind) {
> >>>
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> >
> > Is this for 1.2?
> >
> > Although the fix is pretty obvious, it doesn't seem possible to trigger the
> > segfault today and I believe we're only accepting true bug fixes at this point
> > (ie. two days from the release).
>
> As long as nobody has a scenario which triggers the bug,
> there is no need to apply that patch before 1.2 is released.
>
> That's why I did not add "for 1.2" to the subject line.
Applied to qmp-next, thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-03 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-01 7:30 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qapi: Fix potential NULL pointer segfault Stefan Weil
2012-09-03 6:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-03 16:34 ` Luiz Capitulino
2012-09-03 16:49 ` Stefan Weil
2012-09-03 16:52 ` Luiz Capitulino [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120903135232.14a42e3a@doriath.home \
--to=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=sw@weilnetz.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).