* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qapi: Fix potential NULL pointer segfault
@ 2012-09-01 7:30 Stefan Weil
2012-09-03 6:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Weil @ 2012-09-01 7:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Bonzini; +Cc: Stefan Weil, qemu-devel
Report from smatch:
qapi-visit.c:1640 visit_type_BlockdevAction(8) error:
we previously assumed 'obj' could be null (see line 1639)
qapi-visit.c:2432 visit_type_NetClientOptions(8) error:
we previously assumed 'obj' could be null (see line 2431)
Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
---
scripts/qapi-visit.py | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/scripts/qapi-visit.py b/scripts/qapi-visit.py
index 2afc5c0..1a669f3 100644
--- a/scripts/qapi-visit.py
+++ b/scripts/qapi-visit.py
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ void visit_type_%(name)s(Visitor *m, %(name)s ** obj, const char *name, Error **
if (!error_is_set(errp)) {
visit_start_struct(m, (void **)obj, "%(name)s", name, sizeof(%(name)s), &err);
if (!err) {
- if (!obj || *obj) {
+ if (obj && *obj) {
visit_type_%(name)sKind(m, &(*obj)->kind, "type", &err);
if (!err) {
switch ((*obj)->kind) {
--
1.7.10
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qapi: Fix potential NULL pointer segfault
2012-09-01 7:30 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qapi: Fix potential NULL pointer segfault Stefan Weil
@ 2012-09-03 6:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-03 16:34 ` Luiz Capitulino
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2012-09-03 6:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Weil; +Cc: qemu-devel
Il 01/09/2012 09:30, Stefan Weil ha scritto:
> Report from smatch:
>
> qapi-visit.c:1640 visit_type_BlockdevAction(8) error:
> we previously assumed 'obj' could be null (see line 1639)
> qapi-visit.c:2432 visit_type_NetClientOptions(8) error:
> we previously assumed 'obj' could be null (see line 2431)
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
> ---
> scripts/qapi-visit.py | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/qapi-visit.py b/scripts/qapi-visit.py
> index 2afc5c0..1a669f3 100644
> --- a/scripts/qapi-visit.py
> +++ b/scripts/qapi-visit.py
> @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ void visit_type_%(name)s(Visitor *m, %(name)s ** obj, const char *name, Error **
> if (!error_is_set(errp)) {
> visit_start_struct(m, (void **)obj, "%(name)s", name, sizeof(%(name)s), &err);
> if (!err) {
> - if (!obj || *obj) {
> + if (obj && *obj) {
> visit_type_%(name)sKind(m, &(*obj)->kind, "type", &err);
> if (!err) {
> switch ((*obj)->kind) {
>
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Paolo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qapi: Fix potential NULL pointer segfault
2012-09-03 6:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
@ 2012-09-03 16:34 ` Luiz Capitulino
2012-09-03 16:49 ` Stefan Weil
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Luiz Capitulino @ 2012-09-03 16:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Bonzini; +Cc: Stefan Weil, qemu-devel
On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 08:57:36 +0200
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
> Il 01/09/2012 09:30, Stefan Weil ha scritto:
> > Report from smatch:
> >
> > qapi-visit.c:1640 visit_type_BlockdevAction(8) error:
> > we previously assumed 'obj' could be null (see line 1639)
> > qapi-visit.c:2432 visit_type_NetClientOptions(8) error:
> > we previously assumed 'obj' could be null (see line 2431)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
> > ---
> > scripts/qapi-visit.py | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/scripts/qapi-visit.py b/scripts/qapi-visit.py
> > index 2afc5c0..1a669f3 100644
> > --- a/scripts/qapi-visit.py
> > +++ b/scripts/qapi-visit.py
> > @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ void visit_type_%(name)s(Visitor *m, %(name)s ** obj, const char *name, Error **
> > if (!error_is_set(errp)) {
> > visit_start_struct(m, (void **)obj, "%(name)s", name, sizeof(%(name)s), &err);
> > if (!err) {
> > - if (!obj || *obj) {
> > + if (obj && *obj) {
> > visit_type_%(name)sKind(m, &(*obj)->kind, "type", &err);
> > if (!err) {
> > switch ((*obj)->kind) {
> >
>
> Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Is this for 1.2?
Although the fix is pretty obvious, it doesn't seem possible to trigger the
segfault today and I believe we're only accepting true bug fixes at this point
(ie. two days from the release).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qapi: Fix potential NULL pointer segfault
2012-09-03 16:34 ` Luiz Capitulino
@ 2012-09-03 16:49 ` Stefan Weil
2012-09-03 16:52 ` Luiz Capitulino
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Weil @ 2012-09-03 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Luiz Capitulino; +Cc: Paolo Bonzini, qemu-devel
Am 03.09.2012 18:34, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
> On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 08:57:36 +0200
> Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Il 01/09/2012 09:30, Stefan Weil ha scritto:
>>> Report from smatch:
>>>
>>> qapi-visit.c:1640 visit_type_BlockdevAction(8) error:
>>> we previously assumed 'obj' could be null (see line 1639)
>>> qapi-visit.c:2432 visit_type_NetClientOptions(8) error:
>>> we previously assumed 'obj' could be null (see line 2431)
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
>>> ---
>>> scripts/qapi-visit.py | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/scripts/qapi-visit.py b/scripts/qapi-visit.py
>>> index 2afc5c0..1a669f3 100644
>>> --- a/scripts/qapi-visit.py
>>> +++ b/scripts/qapi-visit.py
>>> @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ void visit_type_%(name)s(Visitor *m, %(name)s ** obj, const char *name, Error **
>>> if (!error_is_set(errp)) {
>>> visit_start_struct(m, (void **)obj, "%(name)s", name, sizeof(%(name)s), &err);
>>> if (!err) {
>>> - if (!obj || *obj) {
>>> + if (obj && *obj) {
>>> visit_type_%(name)sKind(m, &(*obj)->kind, "type", &err);
>>> if (!err) {
>>> switch ((*obj)->kind) {
>>>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>
> Is this for 1.2?
>
> Although the fix is pretty obvious, it doesn't seem possible to trigger the
> segfault today and I believe we're only accepting true bug fixes at this point
> (ie. two days from the release).
As long as nobody has a scenario which triggers the bug,
there is no need to apply that patch before 1.2 is released.
That's why I did not add "for 1.2" to the subject line.
- sw
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qapi: Fix potential NULL pointer segfault
2012-09-03 16:49 ` Stefan Weil
@ 2012-09-03 16:52 ` Luiz Capitulino
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Luiz Capitulino @ 2012-09-03 16:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Weil; +Cc: Paolo Bonzini, qemu-devel
On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 18:49:54 +0200
Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de> wrote:
> Am 03.09.2012 18:34, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
> > On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 08:57:36 +0200
> > Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Il 01/09/2012 09:30, Stefan Weil ha scritto:
> >>> Report from smatch:
> >>>
> >>> qapi-visit.c:1640 visit_type_BlockdevAction(8) error:
> >>> we previously assumed 'obj' could be null (see line 1639)
> >>> qapi-visit.c:2432 visit_type_NetClientOptions(8) error:
> >>> we previously assumed 'obj' could be null (see line 2431)
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
> >>> ---
> >>> scripts/qapi-visit.py | 2 +-
> >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/scripts/qapi-visit.py b/scripts/qapi-visit.py
> >>> index 2afc5c0..1a669f3 100644
> >>> --- a/scripts/qapi-visit.py
> >>> +++ b/scripts/qapi-visit.py
> >>> @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ void visit_type_%(name)s(Visitor *m, %(name)s ** obj, const char *name, Error **
> >>> if (!error_is_set(errp)) {
> >>> visit_start_struct(m, (void **)obj, "%(name)s", name, sizeof(%(name)s), &err);
> >>> if (!err) {
> >>> - if (!obj || *obj) {
> >>> + if (obj && *obj) {
> >>> visit_type_%(name)sKind(m, &(*obj)->kind, "type", &err);
> >>> if (!err) {
> >>> switch ((*obj)->kind) {
> >>>
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> >
> > Is this for 1.2?
> >
> > Although the fix is pretty obvious, it doesn't seem possible to trigger the
> > segfault today and I believe we're only accepting true bug fixes at this point
> > (ie. two days from the release).
>
> As long as nobody has a scenario which triggers the bug,
> there is no need to apply that patch before 1.2 is released.
>
> That's why I did not add "for 1.2" to the subject line.
Applied to qmp-next, thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-09-03 16:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-09-01 7:30 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qapi: Fix potential NULL pointer segfault Stefan Weil
2012-09-03 6:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-03 16:34 ` Luiz Capitulino
2012-09-03 16:49 ` Stefan Weil
2012-09-03 16:52 ` Luiz Capitulino
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).