From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57624)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <imammedo@redhat.com>) id 1TB5wM-00087j-4u
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 11:30:31 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <imammedo@redhat.com>) id 1TB5wG-0000pT-8P
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 11:30:22 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:22054)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <imammedo@redhat.com>) id 1TB5wF-0000oj-Vn
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 11:30:16 -0400
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:30:06 +0200
From: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20120910173006.1a2dc3da@nial.usersys.redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <504E046F.2040305@suse.de>
References: <1346877673-9136-1-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com>
	<504E046F.2040305@suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] x86 CPU patches that didn't get into
 1.2
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Andreas =?ISO-8859-1?B?RuRyYmVy?= <afaerber@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:17:03 +0200
Andreas F=E4rber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote:

> Hi Eduardo,
>=20
> Am 05.09.2012 22:41, schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> > This is a small queue of patches that I consider "ready to go", that
> > didn't enter QEMU 1.2.
>=20
> There's so many x86 CPU series on the list again... Am I understanding
> correctly that this is the start, applying directly to master? Or does
> it have further prerequisites?

Yes, it's the start without prerequisites.

then goes "[PATCH 0/5] i386: cpu: remove duplicate feature names"
and then "[PATCH 00/22 v2] target-i386: convert CPU features into propertie=
s"

> Would be great to get one batch reviewed and applied, so that we can all
> test and review from the same base. ;)
>=20
> Regards,
> Andreas
>=20