From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38396) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TCSGy-0002LG-Aq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 05:33:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TCSGr-0007hV-4K for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 05:33:16 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50142) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TCSGq-0007hL-SU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 05:33:09 -0400 Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 10:33:04 +0100 From: "Daniel P. Berrange" Message-ID: <20120914093304.GC6819@redhat.com> References: <5052DF3A.1070007@msgid.tls.msk.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5052DF3A.1070007@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-system-i386 vs qemu-system-x86_64 ? Reply-To: "Daniel P. Berrange" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Michael Tokarev Cc: qemu-devel On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:39:38AM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: > What's the difference between the two except that the > latter adds some more instructions (actually whole new > subsytem) to the former? Why do we need -i386, what > -x86_64 does not do which does -i386? AFAIK, qemu-system-x86_64 does not support KVM on a 32-bit host. Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|