From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41507) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TCXk2-0002OX-5J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 11:23:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TCXjw-0006xo-Jk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 11:23:38 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:53061) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TCXjw-0006wu-Bl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 11:23:32 -0400 Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 11:23:29 -0400 From: Jason Baron Message-ID: <20120914152329.GL1821@redhat.com> References: <20120914151401.GL22827@valinux.co.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120914151401.GL22827@valinux.co.jp> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/25] q35 series take #1 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Isaku Yamahata Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, jan.kiszka@siemens.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, agraf@suse.de, juzhang@redhat.com, kevin@koconnor.net, avi@redhat.com, mkletzan@redhat.com, lcapitulino@redhat.com, afaerber@suse.de, armbru@redhat.com On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 12:14:01AM +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote: > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 04:12:34PM -0400, Jason Baron wrote: > > 2) hotplug > > I've added piix acpi style hotplug to ich9. > > What's the point of this? > Its design is ad-hoc and shpc/pcie hotplug are available. The point was to get to feature parity with piix. I'm not sure how hard pcie hotplug is to implement really. I was thinking that we could replace the piix hotplug style with pcie hotplug, once that was implemented... thanks, -Jason