From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47315)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <gleb@redhat.com>) id 1TEcxk-0000zj-9M
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 05:22:29 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <gleb@redhat.com>) id 1TEcxZ-0001wo-6A
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 05:22:24 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:18550)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <gleb@redhat.com>) id 1TEcxY-0001we-Ud
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 05:22:13 -0400
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 12:22:05 +0300
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20120920092204.GY20907@redhat.com>
References: <50587258.9090303@siemens.com> <20120919133720.GB22659@snow>
	<5059D26E.2050808@siemens.com>
	<OF164504B0.9943777C-ONC2257A7E.004E83C3-C2257A7E.0050DBC2@il.ibm.com>
	<5059DAC4.9020907@siemens.com>
	<CABurPeedMK0K=24Xz987w4E2Yw-_vD+s2McmnKm4OEAk1weRCA@mail.gmail.com>
	<OFB446208E.3A636A57-ONC2257A7F.0024D1F8-C2257A7F.00264E8C@il.ibm.com>
	<505AC257.3080000@siemens.com> <20120920071912.GX20907@redhat.com>
	<505ADF53.7030306@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <505ADF53.7030306@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Will the ELI incorporated in theKVM?
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Nadav Har'El <NYH@il.ibm.com>, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>, GaoYi <gaoyi709@gmail.com>, "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Michael D Day <mdday@us.ibm.com>, Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@cs.technion.ac.il>, Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>, Abel Gordon <ABELG@il.ibm.com>

On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 12:18:11PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 09/20/2012 10:19 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >> Again: If you think the feature is non-invasive, send patches against
> >> the kernel and QEMU.
> >> 
> > And explain why it is better than what modern HW provides.
> 
> If it's non-invasive (and easily maintainable), it doesn't have to be
> better.
> 
> 
If it were all that it would have been applied already.

--
			Gleb.