From: Rafael Aquini <aquini@redhat.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Richard Davies <richard@arachsys.com>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
QEMU-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 8/9] mm: compaction: Cache if a pageblock was scanned and no pages were isolated
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 14:53:38 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120921175337.GH6665@optiplex.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1348224383-1499-9-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de>
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:46:22AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> When compaction was implemented it was known that scanning could potentially
> be excessive. The ideal was that a counter be maintained for each pageblock
> but maintaining this information would incur a severe penalty due to a
> shared writable cache line. It has reached the point where the scanning
> costs are an serious problem, particularly on long-lived systems where a
> large process starts and allocates a large number of THPs at the same time.
>
> Instead of using a shared counter, this patch adds another bit to the
> pageblock flags called PG_migrate_skip. If a pageblock is scanned by
> either migrate or free scanner and 0 pages were isolated, the pageblock
> is marked to be skipped in the future. When scanning, this bit is checked
> before any scanning takes place and the block skipped if set.
>
> The main difficulty with a patch like this is "when to ignore the cached
> information?" If it's ignored too often, the scanning rates will still
> be excessive. If the information is too stale then allocations will fail
> that might have otherwise succeeded. In this patch
>
> o CMA always ignores the information
> o If the migrate and free scanner meet then the cached information will
> be discarded if it's at least 5 seconds since the last time the cache
> was discarded
> o If there are a large number of allocation failures, discard the cache.
>
> The time-based heuristic is very clumsy but there are few choices for a
> better event. Depending solely on multiple allocation failures still allows
> excessive scanning when THP allocations are failing in quick succession
> due to memory pressure. Waiting until memory pressure is relieved would
> cause compaction to continually fail instead of using reclaim/compaction
> to try allocate the page. The time-based mechanism is clumsy but a better
> option is not obvious.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
> Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> ---
Acked-by: Rafael Aquini <aquini@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-21 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-21 10:46 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/9] Reduce compaction scanning and lock contention Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/9] Revert "mm: compaction: check lock contention first before taking lock" Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 17:46 ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 10:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/9] Revert "mm-compaction-abort-compaction-loop-if-lock-is-contended-or-run-too-long-fix" Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 17:47 ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 10:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/9] Revert "mm: compaction: abort compaction loop if lock is contended or run too long" Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 17:48 ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 10:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/9] mm: compaction: Abort compaction loop if lock is contended or run too long Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 17:50 ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 21:31 ` Andrew Morton
2012-09-25 7:34 ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-21 10:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/9] mm: compaction: Acquire the zone->lru_lock as late as possible Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 17:51 ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-25 7:05 ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-25 7:51 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-25 8:13 ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-25 21:39 ` Andrew Morton
2012-09-26 0:23 ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-26 10:17 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/9] mm: compaction: Acquire the zone->lock " Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 17:52 ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 21:35 ` Andrew Morton
2012-09-24 8:52 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-25 7:36 ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-25 7:35 ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-21 10:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 7/9] Revert "mm: have order > 0 compaction start off where it left" Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 17:52 ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-25 7:37 ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-21 10:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 8/9] mm: compaction: Cache if a pageblock was scanned and no pages were isolated Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 17:53 ` Rafael Aquini [this message]
2012-09-21 21:36 ` Andrew Morton
2012-09-24 9:39 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-24 21:26 ` Andrew Morton
2012-09-25 9:12 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-25 20:03 ` Andrew Morton
2012-09-27 12:06 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] mm: compaction: cache if a pageblock was scanned and no pages were isolated -fix2 Mel Gorman
2012-09-27 13:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 8/9] mm: compaction: Cache if a pageblock was scanned and no pages were isolated Mel Gorman
2012-09-26 0:49 ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-27 12:14 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 9/9] mm: compaction: Restart compaction from near where it left off Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 17:54 ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 13:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/9] Reduce compaction scanning and lock contention Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120921175337.GH6665@optiplex.redhat.com \
--to=aquini@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard@arachsys.com \
--cc=shli@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).