From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35874) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGuYB-0004HS-JF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 12:33:32 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGuY7-0003f4-7m for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 12:33:27 -0400 Received: from e24smtp02.br.ibm.com ([32.104.18.86]:54554) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGuY6-0003eI-Sg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 12:33:23 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e24smtp02.br.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:33:18 -0300 Received: from d24relay01.br.ibm.com (d24relay01.br.ibm.com [9.8.31.16]) by d24dlp02.br.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09CE31DC0024 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 12:33:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from d24av05.br.ibm.com (d24av05.br.ibm.com [9.18.232.44]) by d24relay01.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id q8QGQH2x2658488 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:33:06 -0300 Received: from d24av05.br.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d24av05.br.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id q8QGOvMQ003877 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:24:57 -0300 Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:24:54 -0300 From: Eduardo Otubo Message-ID: <20120926162453.GA12076@bluepex.com> References: <1348174859-24809-1-git-send-email-otubo@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1559484.FIy5X4RP1O@sifl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1559484.FIy5X4RP1O@sifl> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] New syscalls to the seccomp whitelist List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paul Moore Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 11:14:29AM -0400, Paul Moore wrote: > On Thursday, September 20, 2012 06:00:59 PM Eduardo Otubo wrote: > > Seccomp syscall whitelist updated after tests running qemu under > > libvirt ... > > Hi Eduardo, > > I know from our discussions offlist that you have an additional debugging > patch to help identify missing syscalls, perhaps you could also submit that > patch too? I think we would want the debugging patch #ifdef'd out in normal > use, but I think it might help the QEMU developers. That's surely a good thing Paul. I'll rebase my patches and send it right away. Thanks! -- Eduardo Otubo Software Engineer Linux Technology Center IBM Systems & Technology Group