From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44458) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TLZmu-0000my-92 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Oct 2012 09:23:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TLZml-0003lM-6h for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Oct 2012 09:23:56 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58525) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TLZmk-0003kW-TG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Oct 2012 09:23:47 -0400 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q99DNjgu020990 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 9 Oct 2012 09:23:45 -0400 Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 10:24:39 -0300 From: Luiz Capitulino Message-ID: <20121009102439.15ff8fbe@doriath.home> In-Reply-To: <20121008110212.GG20230@redhat.com> References: <506F72C3.5080304@redhat.com> <20121008110212.GG20230@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC: making QMP query-block more useful List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Daniel P. Berrange" Cc: Jeff Cody , QEMU Developers On Mon, 8 Oct 2012 12:02:12 +0100 "Daniel P. Berrange" wrote: > On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 05:52:35PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > > Right now, 'query-block' has no way to filter to a single device, but > > conversely, for each device, it shows only the first backing file, > > rather than the entire backing chain. Jeff and I were lamenting this > > fact on IRC while debugging his block-commit stuff. > > > > Would it be worth enhancing the QMP to be: > > > > ## > > # @query-block: > > # > > # Get a list of BlockInfo for various virtual block devices. > > # > > # @devices: #optional If provided, limit the output to the given > > # device names (since 1.3) > > # > > # @recurse: #optional Provide recursive information on any backing > > # chains (since 1.3, default false) > > # > > # Returns: a list of @BlockInfo describing each virtual block device > > # > > # Since: 0.14.0 > > ## > > { 'command': 'query-block', > > 'arguments': { '*names': ['str'], 'recurse': 'bool' }, > > 'returns': ['BlockInfo'] } > > > > as well as enhancing BlockDeviceInfo to be self-recursive, by adding > > backing_chain as in: > > > > # @backing_chain: #optional, only present if @backing_file is present > > and 'query-block' requested recursion (since 1.3) > > > > { 'type': 'BlockDeviceInfo', > > 'data': { 'file': 'str', 'ro': 'bool', 'drv': 'str', > > '*backing_file': 'str', 'backing_file_depth': 'int', > > '*backing_chain' : 'BlockDeviceInfo', > > 'encrypted': 'bool', 'encryption_key_missing': 'bool', > > 'bps': 'int', 'bps_rd': 'int', 'bps_wr': 'int', > > 'iops': 'int', 'iops_rd': 'int', 'iops_wr': 'int'} } > > > > Or would such modifications require the creation of a new QMP command, > > instead of altering 'query-block'? > > I think I'd probably go for creating a new command myself. I agree that > both the changes you describe would be useful for libvirt needs. I vote for a new command too.