From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41659) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TOGWT-0003O3-5b for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 19:26:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TOGWR-0005be-Pp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 19:26:05 -0400 Received: from hall.aurel32.net ([88.191.126.93]:52893) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TOGWR-0005b3-JC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 19:26:03 -0400 Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 01:26:01 +0200 From: Aurelien Jarno Message-ID: <20121016232601.GA25878@ohm.aurel32.net> References: <1349814458-21739-1-git-send-email-aurelien@aurel32.net> <1349814458-21739-5-git-send-email-aurelien@aurel32.net> <5075D60D.5090700@twiddle.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5075D60D.5090700@twiddle.net> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/14] target-mips: use softfloat constants when possible List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Richard Henderson Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 01:09:49PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 10/09/2012 01:27 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > softfloat already has a few constants defined, use them instead of > > redefining them in target-mips. > > > > Rename FLOAT_SNAN32 and FLOAT_SNAN64 to FP_TO_INT32_OVERFLOW and > > FP_TO_INT64_OVERFLOW as even if they have the same value, they are > > technically different (and defined differently in the MIPS ISA). > > > > Remove the unused constants. > > > > Signed-off-by: Aurelien Jarno > > Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson > > > @@ -2495,8 +2491,9 @@ uint64_t helper_float_cvtl_d(CPUMIPSState *env, uint64_t fdt0) > > set_float_exception_flags(0, &env->active_fpu.fp_status); > > dt2 = float64_to_int64(fdt0, &env->active_fpu.fp_status); > > update_fcr31(env); > > - if (GET_FP_CAUSE(env->active_fpu.fcr31) & (FP_OVERFLOW | FP_INVALID)) > > - dt2 = FLOAT_SNAN64; > > + if (GET_FP_CAUSE(env->active_fpu.fcr31) & (FP_OVERFLOW | FP_INVALID)) { > > + dt2 = FP_TO_INT64_OVERFLOW; > > + } > > return dt2; > > That said, the existing code you're patching is incorrect. > > This code will fold to OVERFLOW if any previous operation caused an overflow, > not checking that the *current* operation caused an overflow. > While I agree it should check the softfloat flags instead, I disagree it is wrong. The part that GET_FP_CAUSE() is looking at is not the accumulated flags, but the flags for the last instruction. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurelien@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net