From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40992) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TOlWg-0005um-OG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 04:32:28 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TOlWb-0000xg-26 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 04:32:22 -0400 Received: from nodalink.pck.nerim.net ([62.212.105.220]:49159 helo=paradis.irqsave.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TOlWa-0000xH-RM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 04:32:16 -0400 Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 10:32:20 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Beno=EEt?= Canet Message-ID: <20121018083220.GA3958@irqsave.net> References: <1350489629-1838-1-git-send-email-benoit@irqsave.net> <507EE664.1070605@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <507EE664.1070605@redhat.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC V2 00/20] QCOW2 deduplication List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Avi Kivity Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com > Can you use glib GTree instead? Ok >=20 > > I am posting this patchset in order to have an early feedback regardi= ng the > > design. >=20 > Since it's still not working, it's hard to tell how effective it is in > practice. I hope to have something working soon. Best regards Beno=EEt