From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
To: Dong Xu Wang <wdongxu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 09/10] Use QemuOpts support in block layer
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 11:51:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121026095132.GF19272@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1351169848-28223-10-git-send-email-wdongxu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 08:57:27PM +0800, Dong Xu Wang wrote:
> @@ -177,9 +177,7 @@ struct BlockDriver {
> unsigned long int req, void *buf,
> BlockDriverCompletionFunc *cb, void *opaque);
>
> - /* List of options for creating images, terminated by name == NULL */
> - QEMUOptionParameter *create_options;
> -
> + QemuOptsList *(*bdrv_create_options)(void);
Why is .bdrv_create_options() a function? It would be less code for
BlockDrivers to have a pointer: QemuOptsList *.
> /* Check if compression is supported */
> if (compress) {
> - QEMUOptionParameter *encryption =
> - get_option_parameter(param, BLOCK_OPT_ENCRYPT);
> - QEMUOptionParameter *preallocation =
> - get_option_parameter(param, BLOCK_OPT_PREALLOC);
> + const char *encryption =
> + qemu_opt_get(param, BLOCK_OPT_ENCRYPT);
> + const char *preallocation =
> + qemu_opt_get(param, BLOCK_OPT_PREALLOC);
>
> if (!drv->bdrv_write_compressed) {
> error_report("Compression not supported for this file format");
> @@ -847,15 +842,15 @@ static int img_convert(int argc, char **argv)
> goto out;
> }
>
> - if (encryption && encryption->value.n) {
> + if (encryption) {
encryption=off will print an error here. We need to use
qemu_opt_get_bool().
> diff --git a/qemu-option.c b/qemu-option.c
> index ab270f0..c391f7d 100644
> --- a/qemu-option.c
> +++ b/qemu-option.c
> @@ -553,10 +553,15 @@ bool qemu_opt_get_bool(QemuOpts *opts, const char *name, bool defval)
>
> uint64_t qemu_opt_get_number(QemuOpts *opts, const char *name, uint64_t defval)
> {
> - QemuOpt *opt = qemu_opt_find(opts, name);
> + QemuOpt *opt;
> + if (!opts) {
> + return defval;
> + }
> + opt = qemu_opt_find(opts, name);
>
> - if (opt == NULL)
> + if (opt == NULL) {
> return defval;
> + }
> assert(opt->desc && opt->desc->type == QEMU_OPT_NUMBER);
> return opt->value.uint;
> }
This should be a separate patch, but there is a problem with the change
anyway: all qemu_opt_*() functions assume QemuOpts *opts is non-NULL.
This change makes qemu_opt_get_number() inconsistent. This will lead to
bugs when people assume qemu_opt_get_bool() also handles opts == NULL,
for example.
Can the qemu-img/block callers make sure opts is never NULL or will that
add a lot of extra checks?
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-26 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-25 12:57 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 00/10] replace QEMUOptionParameter with QemuOpts parser Dong Xu Wang
2012-10-25 12:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 01/10] qemu-option: opt_set(): split it up into more functions Dong Xu Wang
2012-10-25 12:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 02/10] qemu-option: qemu_opts_validate(): fix duplicated code Dong Xu Wang
2012-10-25 12:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 03/10] qemu-option: qemu_opt_set_bool(): fix code duplication Dong Xu Wang
2012-10-25 12:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 04/10] introduce qemu_opts_create_nofail function Dong Xu Wang
2012-10-25 13:06 ` Peter Maydell
2012-10-26 2:46 ` Dong Xu Wang
2012-10-25 12:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 05/10] use qemu_opts_create_nofail Dong Xu Wang
2012-10-25 12:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 06/10] create new function: qemu_opt_set_number Dong Xu Wang
2012-10-26 9:02 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-10-29 8:03 ` Dong Xu Wang
2012-10-25 12:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 07/10] add def_value and use it in qemu_opts_print Dong Xu Wang
2012-10-26 9:32 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-10-25 12:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 08/10] Create four opts list related functions Dong Xu Wang
2012-10-25 12:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 09/10] Use QemuOpts support in block layer Dong Xu Wang
2012-10-26 9:51 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2012-10-25 12:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 10/10] remove QEMUOptionParameter related functions and struct Dong Xu Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121026095132.GF19272@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com \
--to=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=wdongxu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).