From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45844) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TTg8w-0001pC-0O for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:48:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TTg8u-0001Z5-K6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:48:09 -0400 Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 22:47:59 +0100 From: Aurelien Jarno Message-ID: <20121031214759.GD31495@ohm.aurel32.net> References: <1351645206-3041-1-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> <1351645206-3041-30-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> <20121031210527.GC3855@ohm.aurel32.net> <50919A25.3080402@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <50919A25.3080402@suse.de> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 29/35] cpus: Pass CPUState to [qemu_]cpu_has_work() List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Andreas =?iso-8859-15?Q?F=E4rber?= Cc: Peter Maydell , Richard Henderson , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Alexander Graf , Blue Swirl , Max Filippov , Michael Walle , qemu-ppc , Paul Brook , anthony@codemonkey.ws, "Edgar E. Iglesias" , Guan Xuetao , David Gibson On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:37:41PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 31.10.2012 22:05, schrieb Aurelien Jarno: > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 02:00:00AM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote: > >> For target-mips also change the return type to bool. > >> > >> Make include paths for cpu-qom.h consistent for alpha and unicore32. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber > >> [AF: Updated new target-openrisc function accordingly] > [...] > > I find strange to see a pull request for something that hasn't been sent > > on the list before. That said MIPS part is > > > > Acked-by: Aurelien Jarno > > The patch has been on the list before [1], I just spared me a v2 for the > rebase (therefore the marking above) due to the upcoming Soft Freeze. > The responsiveness to these CPUState patches has generally been low in > the past, especially when cross-target, and most of them are rather trivial. > Ok, then I missed it. Sorry about that. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurelien@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net