From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50025)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <stefanha@gmail.com>) id 1Tao08-0001na-G5
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 08:36:40 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <stefanha@gmail.com>) id 1Tao02-0001RZ-FK
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 08:36:32 -0500
Received: from mail-bk0-f45.google.com ([209.85.214.45]:63591)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <stefanha@gmail.com>) id 1Tao02-0001RP-7x
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 08:36:26 -0500
Received: by mail-bk0-f45.google.com with SMTP id jk13so1397697bkc.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 05:36:25 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 14:36:23 +0100
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20121120133623.GH27378@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com>
References: <20121120000450.54B3F41AA0@buildbot.b1-systems.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20121120000450.54B3F41AA0@buildbot.b1-systems.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] buildbot failure in qemu on block_mingw32
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu@buildbot.b1-systems.de
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, gollub@b1-systems.de, agraf@suse.de, lcapitulino@redhat.com

On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 01:04:49AM +0100, qemu@buildbot.b1-systems.de wrote:
> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder block_mingw32 while building qemu.
> Full details are available at:
>  http://buildbot.b1-systems.de/qemu/builders/block_mingw32/builds/390

Known issue: O_NONBLOCK on mingw32.

Stefan