Re: [Qemu-devel] tap devices not receiving packets from a bridge

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 10:41:21AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
> 
> Am 23.11.2012 um 08:02 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
> 
> > On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 03:29:52PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
> >> is anyone aware of a problem with the linux network bridge that in very rare circumstances stops
> >> a bridge from sending pakets to a tap device?
> >> 
> >> My problem occurs in conjunction with vanilla qemu-kvm-1.2.0 and Ubuntu Kernel 3.2.0-34.53
> >> which is based on Linux 3.2.33.
> >> 
> >> I was not yet able to reproduce the issue, it happens in really rare cases. The symptom is that
> >> the tap does not have any TX packets. RX is working fine. I see the packets coming in at
> >> the physical interface on the host, but they are not forwarded to the tap interface.
> >> The bridge itself has learnt the mac address of the vServer that is connected to the tap interface.
> >> It does not help to toggle the bridge link status,  the tap interface status or the interface in the vServer.
> >> It seems that problem occurs if a tap interface that has previously been used, but set to nonpersistent
> >> is set persistent again and then is by chance assigned to the same vServer (=same mac address on same
> >> bridge) again. Unfortunately it seems not to be reproducible.
> > 
> > Not sure but this patch from Michael Tsirkin may help - it solves an
> > issue with persistent tap devices:
> > 
> > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/198598/
> 
> Hi Stefan,
> 
> thanks for the pointer. I have seen this patch, but I have neglected it because it was dealing
> with persistent taps. But maybe the taps in the kernel are not deleted directly. 
> Can you remember what the syptomps of the above issue have been? Sorry for
> being vague, but I currently have no clue whats going on.
> 
> Can someone who has more internal knowledge of the bridging/tap code say if qemu can
> be responsible at all if the tap device is not receiving packets from the bridge.
> 
> If I have the following config. Lets say packets coming in via physical interface eth1.123,
> and a bridge called br123.I further have a virtual machine with tap0. Both eth1.123
> and tap0 are member of br123. 
> 
> If the issue occurs the vServer has no network connectivity inbound. If I sent a ping
> from the vServer I see it on tap0 and leaving on eth1.123. I see further the arp reply coming
> in via eth1.123, but the reply can't be seen on tap0.
> 
> Peter

If guest is not consuming packets, a TX queue in tap device
will with time overrun (there's space for 1000 packets there).
This is code from tun:

        if (skb_queue_len(&tfile->socket.sk->sk_receive_queue)
                          >= dev->tx_queue_len / tun->numqueues){
                if (!(tun->flags & TUN_ONE_QUEUE)) {
                        /* Normal queueing mode. */
                        /* Packet scheduler handles dropping of further
 * packets. */
                        netif_stop_subqueue(dev, txq);

                        /* We won't see all dropped packets
 * individually, so overrun
                         * error is more appropriate. */
                        dev->stats.tx_fifo_errors++;


So you can detect that this triggered by looking at fifo errors counter in device.

Once this happens TX queue is stopped, then you hit this path:

                        if (!netif_xmit_stopped(txq)) {
                                __this_cpu_inc(xmit_recursion);
                                rc = dev_hard_start_xmit(skb, dev, txq);
                                __this_cpu_dec(xmit_recursion);
                                if (dev_xmit_complete(rc)) {
                                        HARD_TX_UNLOCK(dev, txq);
                                        goto out;
                                }
                        }

so packets are not passed to device anymore.
It will stay this way until guest consumes some packets and
queue is restarted.

> > 
> > Stefan