From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57271) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Te74N-00051c-Ay for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 11:34:36 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Te74A-0002FH-71 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 11:34:35 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:6087) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Te749-0002Et-W1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 11:34:22 -0500 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qATGYLbW002864 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 11:34:21 -0500 Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 14:34:19 -0200 From: Luiz Capitulino Message-ID: <20121129143419.47feb550@doriath.home> In-Reply-To: <20121102114232.2b229ec3@doriath.home> References: <1350656885-6485-1-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com> <20121102112550.4ee6de09@doriath.home> <5093CD33.8060709@redhat.com> <20121102114232.2b229ec3@doriath.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] block: bdrv_img_create(): propagate errors List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com On Fri, 2 Nov 2012 11:42:32 -0200 Luiz Capitulino wrote: > On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 14:40:03 +0100 > Kevin Wolf wrote: > > > Am 02.11.2012 14:25, schrieb Luiz Capitulino: > > > On Fri, 19 Oct 2012 11:27:59 -0300 > > > Luiz Capitulino wrote: > > > > > >> By adding error propagation to bdrv_img_create() we improve error reporting > > >> in qmp_transaction() and simplify qemu-img.c:img_create() a bit. > > >> > > >> Please, check individual patches for details. > > > > > > Kevin, is this in your review queue? > > > > Yes, it is. With KVM Forum and lots of other patch series, no promises > > though. > > Sure, just wanted to know if you were aware about it. Still in your queue? :)