From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44877) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TfqxL-0002h9-KK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 06:46:40 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TfqxK-0006ch-H6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 06:46:31 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59843) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TfqxK-0006cW-9v for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 06:46:30 -0500 Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 09:46:28 -0200 From: Luiz Capitulino Message-ID: <20121204094628.1518b973@doriath.home> In-Reply-To: <50BCCB77.1080404@redhat.com> References: <50BCCB77.1080404@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] detecting seccomp sandbox capability via QMP List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?ISO-8859-1?B?SuFu?= Tomko Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, otubo@linux.vnet.ibm.com On Mon, 03 Dec 2012 16:55:35 +0100 J=E1n Tomko wrote: > Hello, >=20 > is there a way to check if QEMU was compiled with --enable-seccomp via QM= P? Not that I'm aware of. Could you describe your use-case?