From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53359) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TfuFa-0005M9-CQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 10:17:43 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TfuFU-0004Ge-C8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 10:17:34 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:18908) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TfuFU-0004Fy-57 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 10:17:28 -0500 Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 13:17:20 -0200 From: Luiz Capitulino Message-ID: <20121204131720.3b1648f3@doriath.home> In-Reply-To: <50BE0BD8.2010501@redhat.com> References: <50BCCB77.1080404@redhat.com> <20121204094628.1518b973@doriath.home> <50BE0BD8.2010501@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] detecting seccomp sandbox capability via QMP List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?ISO-8859-1?B?SuFu?= Tomko Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, otubo@linux.vnet.ibm.com On Tue, 04 Dec 2012 15:42:32 +0100 J=E1n Tomko wrote: > On 12/04/12 12:46, Luiz Capitulino wrote: > > On Mon, 03 Dec 2012 16:55:35 +0100 > > J=E1n Tomko wrote: > >=20 > >> Hello, > >> > >> is there a way to check if QEMU was compiled with --enable-seccomp via= QMP? > >=20 > > Not that I'm aware of. Could you describe your use-case? >=20 > It's for libvirt. The detection is broken since the switch from parsing > -help output to QMP and I wanted to fix it. Different folks have been adding QMP commands to allow feature detection, then I believe that's what we should do.