From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56303)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <gsomlo@gmail.com>) id 1TgGHv-0004YO-2E
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 09:49:32 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <gsomlo@gmail.com>) id 1TgGHm-0000Kj-Eq
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 09:49:26 -0500
Received: from mail-qa0-f45.google.com ([209.85.216.45]:59702)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <gsomlo@gmail.com>) id 1TgGHm-0000KZ-Am
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 09:49:18 -0500
Received: by mail-qa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id j15so2086113qaq.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 06:49:17 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 09:49:14 -0500
From: "Gabriel L. Somlo" <gsomlo@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20121205144913.GD18148@hedwig.ini.cmu.edu>
References: <50BDA8EB.5090402@redhat.com>
	<20121204144243.GB13356@hedwig.ini.cmu.edu>
	<20121204151136.GA11468@redhat.com>
	<20121204153957.GC13356@hedwig.ini.cmu.edu>
	<50BE2B57.10501@redhat.com>
	<20121204171404.GD13356@hedwig.ini.cmu.edu>
	<50BEEEA9.2090807@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <50BEEEA9.2090807@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL for-1.3 0/3] seabios: q35 update
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: rene@exactcode.com, jan.kiszka@siemens.com, jbaron@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, agraf@suse.de, anthony@codemonkey.ws

On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 07:50:17AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Ok, so no IRQ declared for the RTC.  We have IRQ 8 for both rtc and
> hpet, which most likely is the root cause for the issue.  You can try
> simply dropping the line for testing.  I'll try to come up with
> something more clever as the hpet can be disabled in which case we
> should keep irq8 assigned to rtc.

Yeah, with SnowLeopard, simply leaving out the IRQ on RTC in SeaBIOS
got me all the way to a blue screen with a moving mouse pointer, but
no further :)

However, the acpi-dsdt-isa.dsl RTC patch you just sent to SeaBIOS
has no (negative) impact on my ability to boot SnowLeopard.

Thanks much,
--Gabriel