From: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
To: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Don Slutz" <Don@CloudSwitch.Com>,
"Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>,
"Anthony Liguori" <anthony@codemonkey.ws>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 8/8] qom: Make CPU a child of DeviceState
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:27:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121212152724.7693d277@nial.usersys.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121212135901.GD3236@otherpad.lan.raisama.net>
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 11:59:01 -0200
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 02:34:08PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
> > Am 05.12.2012 17:49, schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> [...]
> > > static TypeInfo cpu_type_info = {
> > > .name = TYPE_CPU,
> > > - .parent = TYPE_OBJECT,
> > > + .parent = TYPE_DEVICE,
> > > .instance_size = sizeof(CPUState),
> > > .abstract = true,
> > > .class_size = sizeof(CPUClass),
> >
> > This patch makes the CPU a device and looks good so far but does not
> > initialize the devices in cpu_*_init() like Anthony did in his previous
> > patch. I am unsure whether you forgot to do so or whether you wanted to
> > help keep our new CPU code clean of old-style qdev_init_nofail() calls?
> > Since you don't add a qdev initfn here the main difference will be the
> > devices internally staying in "created" rather than "initialized" state.
>
> I think I used a version without the qdev_init_nofail() as base for this
> series (we had multiple proposals being sent in parallel, in the
> beginning), and in the end I forgot that we had a version with those
> calls being added.
>
> The CPU classes don't set any DeviceClass.init() method, so in theory
> the missing qdev_init() calls wouldn't make any difference by now. On
> the other hand, keeping the device in "created" state sounds bad... but
> maybe this acceptable while we are still converting the CPU realize()
> functions to fit inside the DeviceState initialization abstraction?
Testing shows that lack of qdev_create()/init() doesn't break anything so
far. I was planing to send hot-plug RFC after properties and subclasses for
x86 are done and temporally wrap x86_cpu_realize() inside DeviceClass.init()
so we could use qdev_create()/init() and device_add() for CPU.
It's still on my TODO list. Perhaps after I resubmit properties series (I
hope to do it this week), I'll redo hot-plug prototype using as a base my
experimental subclasses branch
https://github.com/imammedo/qemu/commits/x86-cpu-classes.WIP
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-12 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-05 16:49 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] CPU DeviceState v10 Eduardo Habkost
2012-12-05 16:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/8] Move -I$(SRC_PATH)/include compiler flag to Makefile.objs Eduardo Habkost
2012-12-14 15:34 ` Andreas Färber
2012-12-14 15:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-14 17:21 ` Eduardo Habkost
2013-01-02 13:48 ` Andreas Färber
2013-01-02 14:32 ` Eduardo Habkost
2012-12-05 16:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/8] libqemustub: Add qemu_[un]register_reset() stubs Eduardo Habkost
2012-12-05 16:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/8] libqemustub: vmstate register/unregister stubs Eduardo Habkost
2013-01-02 12:57 ` Andreas Färber
2012-12-05 16:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/8] libqemustub: sysbus_get_default() stub Eduardo Habkost
2012-12-05 16:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/8] qdev: Coding style fixes Eduardo Habkost
2012-12-18 22:01 ` Andreas Färber
2012-12-05 16:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/8] qdev-properties.c: Separate core from the code used only by qemu-system-* Eduardo Habkost
2012-12-18 22:30 ` Andreas Färber
2012-12-05 16:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 7/8] include qdev code into *-user, too Eduardo Habkost
2012-12-05 16:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 8/8] qom: Make CPU a child of DeviceState Eduardo Habkost
2012-12-12 13:34 ` Andreas Färber
2012-12-12 13:59 ` Eduardo Habkost
2012-12-12 14:27 ` Igor Mammedov [this message]
2012-12-12 14:36 ` Eduardo Habkost
2012-12-14 15:29 ` Andreas Färber
2012-12-14 15:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-14 15:44 ` Andreas Färber
2012-12-14 17:56 ` Eduardo Habkost
2013-01-02 15:08 ` Andreas Färber
2013-01-02 16:40 ` Igor Mammedov
2013-01-02 16:49 ` Eduardo Habkost
2013-01-03 17:36 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] CPU DeviceState v10 Andreas Färber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121212152724.7693d277@nial.usersys.redhat.com \
--to=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=Don@CloudSwitch.Com \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).