From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40990) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TkFLx-00064j-5s for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 16 Dec 2012 09:38:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TkFLt-0001Gz-Q6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 16 Dec 2012 09:38:05 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:14186) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TkFLt-0001Gh-IZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 16 Dec 2012 09:38:01 -0500 Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 16:41:09 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20121216144109.GA9993@redhat.com> References: <20121213072606.GA833@redhat.com> <87fw39r8w6.fsf@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87fw39r8w6.fsf@codemonkey.ws> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL] pci,net,misc infrastructure List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: yamahata@valinux.co.jp, jbaron@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 02:31:53PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote: > "Michael S. Tsirkin" writes: > > > The following changes since commit 1c97e303d4ea80a2691334b0febe87a50660f99d: > > > > Merge remote-tracking branch 'afaerber/qom-cpu' into staging (2012-12-10 08:35:15 -0600) > > > > are available in the git repository at: > > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/mst/qemu.git tags/for_anthony > > > > for you to fetch changes up to 5c1ad98d71923b83a530e5db4c2110564b84e11d: > > > > pci_bus.h: tweak include guards (2012-12-12 23:41:04 +0200) > > Doesn't build: > > CC hw/apm.o > /home/anthony/git/qemu/hw/apm.c:25:17: fatal error: pci.h: No such file or directory > compilation terminated. > > And there's really no good reason for this. apm's part of target-i386 > so you couldn't have built this prior to doing a pull request. > > Please setup your tree in buildbot and wait for a full run before > sending a pull requests in the future. > > Regards, > > Anthony Liguori Ugh. I'm not sure but I think I see how this happened: I re-run make after each commit, before the last one apm.c did find the header it depends on, the last commit only removes the -I flag to find the header but neither the header itself not the C file changed so it didn't need to rebuild. -- MST