From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47123) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TkyTY-0000zo-LY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 09:49:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TkyTT-0002aR-It for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 09:48:56 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:63204) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TkyTT-0002aB-Ad for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 09:48:51 -0500 Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 16:51:54 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20121218145154.GA27400@redhat.com> References: <1354887155-32281-1-git-send-email-fred.konrad@greensocs.com> <20121217154508.GA28712@redhat.com> <20121218110153.GC22586@redhat.com> <50D05898.9030506@redhat.com> <20121218131043.GA26110@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v6 0/6] Virtio refactoring. List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, e.voevodin@samsung.com, mark.burton@greensocs.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com, cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com, Paolo Bonzini , afaerber@suse.de, fred.konrad@greensocs.com On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 02:00:11PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 18 December 2012 13:10, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > And what makes virtio so special anyway? e1000 can be used without > > exposing users to internal buses and all kind of nastiness like this. > > Congratulations, you're using an architecture that has a pluggable > discoverable bus implemented by just about all machines using that > architecture. That makes things much easier for you. > > -- PMM That's on the guest side. Yes, drivers are a problem but they are not qemu problem as such. But on the user/qemu side I dont' yes see why it's so different.