From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58266) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TlCsR-00041F-Vy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 01:11:39 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TlCsP-0005JL-3W for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 01:11:35 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:61718) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TlCsO-0005JA-SB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 01:11:33 -0500 Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 08:14:37 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20121219061437.GA4721@redhat.com> References: <1355768254-12933-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <87623z6pr1.fsf@codemonkey.ws> <50D0DBF9.7070108@redhat.com> <87r4mmnbl4.fsf@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87r4mmnbl4.fsf@codemonkey.ws> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/45] Include reorganization + PCI patch queue List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: Paolo Bonzini , David Gibson , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Alex Graf On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 06:13:11PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote: > Paolo Bonzini writes: > > > And how does it conflicts with Alex's ppc pull request? It is a fast > > forward from origin/master as of now (commit a8a826a, exec: refactor > > cpu_restore_state, 2012-12-04), and that includes Alex's commits... > > It's not a conflict. You both have problems with your pull requests > because I assume neither of you have libfdt installed which means a > bunch of ppc is not being built. > > We really ought to pull in fdt as a submodule to prevent this type of > thing... Same applies to any library. How about an in-tree script with configure flags that we want tested instead? Then it would fail instead of disabling silently.