From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41222) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TmsGv-0006xX-Lp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 15:35:46 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TmsGr-0008Mq-Nc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 15:35:45 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:26996) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TmsGr-0008Ml-Fj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 15:35:41 -0500 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qBNKZenr001268 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 15:35:40 -0500 Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 22:35:35 +0200 From: Alon Levy Message-ID: <20121223203534.GD7485@garlic> References: <50B5DB05.3050409@redhat.com> <1996657319.38927007.1354096430632.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> <50D17BD8.7040009@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50D17BD8.7040009@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] libcacard: use LDFLAGS to produce i686 with --cpu=i386 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 09:33:28AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 28/11/2012 10:53, Alon Levy ha scritto: > >> Il 28/11/2012 10:16, Alon Levy ha scritto: > >>> > > diff --git a/roms/openbios b/roms/openbios > >>> > > index f095c85..d1d2787 160000 > >>> > > --- a/roms/openbios > >>> > > +++ b/roms/openbios > >>> > > @@ -1 +1 @@ > >>> > > -Subproject commit f095c858136896d236931357b8d597f407286f71 > >>> > > +Subproject commit d1d2787f87167edf487a60e61b9168514d5a7434 > >> > > >> > This is probably unwanted. > > Yes, my bad. I'll drop it in the pull request. > > > > Are you going to send it soon? I didn't manage to do this, I guess your new series includes this? I'll try to review it. > > Paolo