From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38704) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TsMjD-0007MZ-03 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 19:07:40 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TsMjC-0004ho-1z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 19:07:38 -0500 Received: from speedy.comstyle.com ([2001:470:1d:8c::2]:27991 helo=mail.comstyle.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TsMjB-0004he-Tf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 19:07:37 -0500 Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 19:07:30 -0500 From: Brad Smith Message-ID: <20130108000725.GS14265@rox.home.comstyle.com> References: <1353432821-32517-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <50ABC101.5030005@redhat.com> <20121121014332.GB16980@morn.localdomain> <50EADBCD.1070501@redhat.com> <20130107233401.GA24743@morn.localdomain> <20130107235102.GQ14265@rox.home.comstyle.com> <20130107235600.GA26130@morn.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130107235600.GA26130@morn.localdomain> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [SeaBIOS] SeaBIOS release for QEMU 1.3 (was Re: [PATCH] esp: enable busmaster) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin O'Connor Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Anthony Liguori , "seabios@seabios.org" , Gerd Hoffmann , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 06:56:00PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote: > On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 06:51:03PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 06:34:01PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 03:29:33PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > >> Kevin, are you okay with tagging SeaBIOS master as 1.7.2 one of these > > > > >> days? Other opinions? > > > > > > > > > > A new release can be produced if desired. Given that there isn't much > > > > > new since 1.7.1 I too would prefer to just push forward to 1.7.2. > > > > > > > > Ping? Meanwhile 1.4 freeze is in sight (soft freeze in one week, hard > > > > freeze + -rc0 feb 1st). > > > > Why is 1.4 being rushed so quick? Is this because 1.3.0 was so broken or > > is there something else? > > I don't understand your questions. The 1.4 release is for QEMU and I > don't control its release schedule. Of course the 1.4 release is for QEMU, that's pretty obvious. Sorry the question wasn't necessarily for you. I just noticed what was quoted when you had replied. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.