From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35983)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1TtGJg-0002tK-4c
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 06:29:04 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1TtGJd-0002Xb-9J
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 06:28:59 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:62587)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1TtGJd-0002XN-2c
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 06:28:57 -0500
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 13:32:44 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20130110113244.GG13451@redhat.com>
References: <20130109102238.GC30914@redhat.com> <50ED4C0C.5070109@redhat.com>
	<20130109110926.GA17317@redhat.com> <50ED50B7.4000907@redhat.com>
	<20130109121027.GA18244@redhat.com> <50EDACE6.7080706@redhat.com>
	<87wqvm5buw.fsf@codemonkey.ws> <50EDDFB2.9000308@redhat.com>
	<20130109214019.GA11806@redhat.com> <50EE7C49.8000300@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <50EE7C49.8000300@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/15] qdev: make reset semantics more
 clear and consistent, reset qbuses under virtio devices
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Andreas =?iso-8859-1?Q?F=E4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>

On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 09:31:05AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 09/01/2013 22:40, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
> > > Warm reset (virtio status register reset) of virtio-scsi wasn't
> > > propagated down to the SCSI bus.  I fixed it using qdev_reset_all, but
> > > now I'll do it manually in the HBA.  I'm fine with that as long as all
> > > buses move away from device_reset.
> > 
> > You also pointed out some bug related to status register handling in virtio
> > on s390, right?
> 
> Yes, that would be a separate patch.  A large part of this series can
> also be kept.
> 
> Paolo

Let's start with bugfixes, no need to bundle them in a series.