From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: "Jason J. Herne" <jjherne@us.ibm.com>
Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, jan.kiszka@siemens.com, agraf@suse.de,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
R65777@freescale.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/7 v2] KVM regsync: Add register bitmap parameter to do_kvm_cpu_synchronize_state
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 14:05:33 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130116160533.GA8541@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1357831744-3950-1-git-send-email-jjherne@us.ibm.com>
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:29:04AM -0500, Jason J. Herne wrote:
> From: "Jason J. Herne" <jjherne@us.ibm.com>
>
> do_kvm_cpu_synchronize_state is called via run_on_cpu, so we can only pass
> a single argument. Create SyncStateArgs struct for this purpose and add
> register bitmap data member to it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason J. Herne <jjherne@us.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
> ---
> include/sysemu/kvm.h | 6 ++++++
> kvm-all.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++----------
> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/sysemu/kvm.h b/include/sysemu/kvm.h
> index e0738ba..193d1f4 100644
> --- a/include/sysemu/kvm.h
> +++ b/include/sysemu/kvm.h
> @@ -223,6 +223,12 @@ int kvm_check_extension(KVMState *s, unsigned int extension);
>
> uint32_t kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid(KVMState *env, uint32_t function,
> uint32_t index, int reg);
> +
> +struct kvm_cpu_syncstate_args {
> + CPUState *cpu;
> + int regmap;
> +};
> +
> void kvm_cpu_synchronize_state(CPUArchState *env);
> void kvm_cpu_synchronize_post_reset(CPUArchState *env);
> void kvm_cpu_synchronize_post_init(CPUArchState *env);
> diff --git a/kvm-all.c b/kvm-all.c
> index 1aa61bb..77ab72a 100644
> --- a/kvm-all.c
> +++ b/kvm-all.c
> @@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ int kvm_init_vcpu(CPUArchState *env)
>
> cpu->kvm_fd = ret;
> cpu->kvm_state = s;
> - cpu->kvm_vcpu_dirty = true;
> + cpu->kvm_vcpu_dirty = KVM_REGSYNC_FULL_STATE;
>
> mmap_size = kvm_ioctl(s, KVM_GET_VCPU_MMAP_SIZE, 0);
> if (mmap_size < 0) {
> @@ -1491,20 +1491,27 @@ void kvm_flush_coalesced_mmio_buffer(void)
>
> static void do_kvm_cpu_synchronize_state(void *arg)
> {
> - CPUState *cpu = arg;
> + struct kvm_cpu_syncstate_args *args = arg;
>
> - if (!cpu->kvm_vcpu_dirty) {
> - kvm_arch_get_registers(cpu, KVM_REGSYNC_FULL_STATE);
> - cpu->kvm_vcpu_dirty = true;
> + /* Do not sync regs that are already dirty */
> + int regs_to_get = args->regmap & ~args->cpu->kvm_vcpu_dirty;
> +
> + if (regs_to_get) {
> + kvm_arch_get_registers(args->cpu, regs_to_get);
> + args->cpu->kvm_vcpu_dirty |= regs_to_get;
> }
> }
>
> void kvm_cpu_synchronize_state(CPUArchState *env)
> {
> CPUState *cpu = ENV_GET_CPU(env);
> + struct kvm_cpu_syncstate_args args;
> +
> + args.cpu = cpu;
> + args.regmap = KVM_REGSYNC_FULL_STATE;
>
> - if (!cpu->kvm_vcpu_dirty) {
> - run_on_cpu(cpu, do_kvm_cpu_synchronize_state, cpu);
> + if (args.regmap & ~cpu->kvm_vcpu_dirty) {
> + run_on_cpu(cpu, do_kvm_cpu_synchronize_state, &args);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -1513,7 +1520,7 @@ void kvm_cpu_synchronize_post_reset(CPUArchState *env)
> CPUState *cpu = ENV_GET_CPU(env);
>
> kvm_arch_put_registers(cpu, KVM_REGSYNC_RESET_STATE);
> - cpu->kvm_vcpu_dirty = false;
> + cpu->kvm_vcpu_dirty &= ~KVM_REGSYNC_RESET_STATE;
> }
>
> void kvm_cpu_synchronize_post_init(CPUArchState *env)
> @@ -1521,7 +1528,7 @@ void kvm_cpu_synchronize_post_init(CPUArchState *env)
> CPUState *cpu = ENV_GET_CPU(env);
>
> kvm_arch_put_registers(cpu, KVM_REGSYNC_FULL_STATE);
> - cpu->kvm_vcpu_dirty = false;
> + cpu->kvm_vcpu_dirty &= ~KVM_REGSYNC_FULL_STATE;
> }
>
> int kvm_cpu_exec(CPUArchState *env)
> @@ -1540,7 +1547,7 @@ int kvm_cpu_exec(CPUArchState *env)
> do {
> if (cpu->kvm_vcpu_dirty) {
> kvm_arch_put_registers(cpu, KVM_REGSYNC_RUNTIME_STATE);
> - cpu->kvm_vcpu_dirty = false;
> + cpu->kvm_vcpu_dirty &= ~KVM_REGSYNC_RUNTIME_STATE;
> }
1) This implies a vcpu can enter guest mode with kvm_vcpu_dirty non-zero.
Unrelated:
2) Also, what is the reason for specifying sets of registers in
arch-specific code? Is that because it allows PPC to fix their sync-timer
register problem?
When you are writing generic code, what does it mean to
use 'KVM_REGSYNC_{RUNTIME,RESET,FULL}_STATE' ?
Answer: it depends on the architecture.
3) On x86, kvm_arch_get_registers(GET_FULL) must not imply
kvm_arch_put_registers(PUT_FULL).
The S/390 problem, from
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-11/msg02213.html:
">>> The kvm register sync needs to happen in the kvm register sync
>>> function :)
>> That would eliminate the whole purpose of sync regs and forces us to
>> have an
>> expensive ioctl on lots of exits (again). I would prefer to sync the
>> registers
>> that we never need in qemu just here.
>
> That's why the register sync has different stages.
Not the get_register. Which is called on every synchronize_state. Which
happen
quite often
on s390."
But wait: on these S/390 codepaths, you do GET_REGS already, via
cpu_synchronize_state.
So on S/390
- cpu_synchronize_state(env)
- read any register from env
Is not valid? This is what generic code assumes.
Bhushan Bharat, the PPC problem, can you describe it clearly: from what
i understood, an in-kernel register cannot be read/written back because
that register value can change in the meantime. When is it necessary
to write it back? (there is a similar problem with TSC on x86, which
is "fixed" by only writing TSC on FULL_STATE arch_put_registers).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-16 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-10 15:29 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/7 v2] KVM regsync: Add register bitmap parameter to do_kvm_cpu_synchronize_state Jason J. Herne
2013-01-12 11:08 ` Blue Swirl
2013-01-14 11:32 ` Bhushan Bharat-R65777
2013-01-16 16:05 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2013-01-16 16:12 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-01-16 17:00 ` Bhushan Bharat-R65777
2013-01-16 17:23 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-01-16 20:09 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-01-16 20:03 ` Christian Borntraeger
2013-01-16 20:21 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-01-16 20:41 ` Christian Borntraeger
2013-01-16 23:01 ` Marcelo Tosatti
[not found] ` <9F9185C2-DDA5-4242-9BF2-664F4E0329F9@suse.de>
2013-02-01 15:47 ` Jason J. Herne
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130116160533.GA8541@amt.cnet \
--to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=R65777@freescale.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=jjherne@us.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).