From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37175)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1TvmW1-0002aK-TM
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 05:16:12 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1TvmVw-0004FZ-Ac
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 05:16:09 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:44374)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1TvmVw-0004FS-2r
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 05:16:04 -0500
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 11:34:42 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20130117093441.GB14388@redhat.com>
References: <1358315821-29519-1-git-send-email-akong@redhat.com>
	<1358317007-29972-1-git-send-email-akong@redhat.com>
	<87mww8y5bb.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
	<20130117054511.GA12468@t430s.redhat.com>
	<20130117083954.GA19648@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130117083954.GA19648@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [QEMU PATCH v2] virtio-net: introduce a new
 macaddr control
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>, Amos Kong <akong@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 09:39:54AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 01:45:11PM +0800, Amos Kong wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:49:20AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > > akong@redhat.com writes:
> > > > @@ -349,6 +351,14 @@ static int virtio_net_handle_mac(VirtIONet *n, uint8_t cmd,
> > > >  {
> > > >      struct virtio_net_ctrl_mac mac_data;
> > > >  
> > > > +    if (cmd == VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_MAC_ADDR_SET && elem->out_num == 2 &&
> > > > +        elem->out_sg[1].iov_len == ETH_ALEN) {
> > > > +        /* Set MAC address */
> > > > +        memcpy(n->mac, elem->out_sg[1].iov_base, elem->out_sg[1].iov_len);
> > > > +        qemu_format_nic_info_str(&n->nic->nc, n->mac);
> > > > +        return VIRTIO_NET_OK;
> > > > +    }
> > > 
> > > Does the rest of the net device still rely on the layout of descriptors?
> > 
> > No, only info string of net client relies on n->mac
> 
> I think the question is whether the hw/virtio-net.c code makes
> assumptions about virtqueue descriptor layout (e.g. sg[0] is the header,
> sg[1] is the data buffer).
> 
> The answer is yes, the control virtqueue function directly accesses
> iov[n].
> 
> Additional patches would be required to convert the existing
> hw/virtio-net.c code to make no assumptions about virtqueue descriptor
> layout.  It's outside the scope of this series.
> 
> Stefan

It's not hard at all though - the harder part is data path
processing, this has been done already. Will send a
patch shortly.