From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54710) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tw8Vj-0008Hh-Qm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 04:45:22 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tw8Vg-0006HC-6C for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 04:45:19 -0500 Received: from relay1.mentorg.com ([192.94.38.131]:59944) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tw8Vg-0006H2-0g for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 04:45:16 -0500 From: Paul Brook Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 09:45:09 +0000 References: <1358490399-18242-1-git-send-email-dantesu@faraday-tech.com> In-Reply-To: <1358490399-18242-1-git-send-email-dantesu@faraday-tech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <201301180945.11185.paul@codesourcery.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-arm: add Faraday ARMv5TE processors support List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Dante Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org > * ARMv5TE series (FA606TE, FA626TE, FA616TE, FA726TE) > > All the single core RISC listed above are included in this patch. > And there are two Faraday CP15 extensions (AUX and I/D-Scratchpad) > have been implemented as NOP. Is a NOP appropriate? Should you at least read the value back? > ********************* Confidentiality Notice ************************ > This electronic message and any attachments may contain > confidential and legally privileged information or > information which is otherwise protected from disclosure. > If you are not the intended recipient,please do not disclose > the contents, either in whole or in part, to anyone,and > immediately delete the message and any attachments from > your computer system and destroy all hard copies. > Thank you for your cooperation. > *********************************************************************** This sort of disclaimer is completely inappropriate for public mailing lists, and I'm unwilling to touch anything subject to these restrictions. As instructed I have deleted all your other email unread. Paul