From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35885)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jcody@redhat.com>) id 1UDb6t-0001E6-Cb
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 08:43:55 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jcody@redhat.com>) id 1UDb6p-0002i1-DA
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 08:43:51 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:15979)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jcody@redhat.com>) id 1UDb6p-0002hl-5E
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 08:43:47 -0500
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 08:43:43 -0500
From: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20130307134343.GD22782@localhost.localdomain>
References: <cover.1362580930.git.jcody@redhat.com>
	<62ed7da4f3e2951bac1c4427bd295515a757bbd5.1362580930.git.jcody@redhat.com>
	<20130307131542.GB27175@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130307131542.GB27175@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/7] block: vhdx header for the QEMU
 support of VHDX images
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, sw@weilnetz.de, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 02:15:42PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 09:47:41AM -0500, Jeff Cody wrote:
> > +#define VHDX_ZERO_MGIC 0x6F72657A /* 'zero' */
> 
> s/MGIC/MAGIC/
> 
> > +typedef struct QEMU_PACKED vhdx_log_zero_descriptor {
> > +    uint32_t    zero_signature;         /* "zero" in ASCII */
> > +    uint32_t    reserver;
> 
> s/reserver/reserved/ ?

Yes, thanks (on both counts).