From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39969) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UDsvW-0000VO-Ap for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 03:45:20 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UDsvU-0003sA-5a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 03:45:18 -0500 Received: from mail-wg0-f45.google.com ([74.125.82.45]:51816) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UDsvT-0003rz-Vq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 03:45:16 -0500 Received: by mail-wg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id dq12so2244832wgb.12 for ; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 00:45:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 09:45:12 +0100 From: Stefan Hajnoczi Message-ID: <20130308084512.GB8984@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> References: <20130307110207.17430.68584.malonedeb@gac.canonical.com> <20130307181428.3305.38069.malone@soybean.canonical.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130307181428.3305.38069.malone@soybean.canonical.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Bug 1151986] Re: buffer overflow after block-stream via QMP List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Bug 1151986 <1151986@bugs.launchpad.net> Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 06:14:27PM -0000, Helge Rausch wrote: > I cannot reproduce it anymore on master. One option we now have without > building it ourselves is using 1.4.0 from Ubuntu's raring derivate. > Would you consider that stable enough for production use (the qemu > package, not raring)? QEMU 1.4.0 is a stable release, it is intended for production use. I can't speak for Ubuntu packaging of QEMU 1.4.0, perhaps check the bug tracker to see if there are known issues with the package. Stefan