From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48438) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UDtUQ-0002eT-QK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 04:21:27 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UDtUL-0007pT-Me for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 04:21:22 -0500 Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 10:21:02 +0100 From: Stefan Hajnoczi Message-ID: <20130308092102.GD9597@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> References: <20130307033301.GA48996@cs.nctu.edu.tw> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20130307033301.GA48996@cs.nctu.edu.tw> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Use proper term in TCG README List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?utf-8?B?6Zmz6Z+L5Lu7IChXZWktUmVuIENoZW4p?= Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 11:33:01AM +0800, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen) wrote: > In TCG, "target" means the host architecture for which TCG generates the > code. Using "guest" rather than "target" to make the document more consistent. > > Signed-off-by: Chen Wei-Ren > --- > tcg/README | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tcg/README b/tcg/README > index 934e7af..22174c0 100644 > --- a/tcg/README > +++ b/tcg/README > @@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ double-word product T0. The later is returned in two single-word outputs. > > Similar to mulu2, except the two inputs T1 and T2 are signed. > > -********* 64-bit target on 32-bit host support > +********* 64-bit guest on 32-bit host support > > The following opcodes are internal to TCG. Thus they are to be implemented by > 32-bit host code generators, but are not to be emitted by guest translators. Review from TCG experts please. It seems we have multiple meanings for "target" (e.g. ./configure --target-list= does not mean "the host architecture for which TCG generates code"), if this is really the way TCG uses the term then fine. Stefan