From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49412) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UHkt8-0006eS-CH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 20:58:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UHkt5-0007GS-1A for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 20:58:50 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:45921) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UHkt4-0007GA-PS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 20:58:46 -0400 Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 08:58:40 +0800 From: Asias He Message-ID: <20130319005840.GC15879@hj.localdomain> References: <1363311916-23121-1-git-send-email-asias@redhat.com> <1363641974.3156.59.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1363641974.3156.59.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Fix booting tcm_vhost + seabios List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" Cc: target-devel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" , seabios@seabios.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, Kevin O'Connor , Stefan Hajnoczi , Paolo Bonzini On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 02:26:14PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > On Fri, 2013-03-15 at 09:45 +0800, Asias He wrote: > > Asias He (2): > > virtio-scsi: Set _DRIVER_OK flag before scsi target scanning > > virtio-scsi: Pack struct virtio_scsi_{req_cmd,resp_cmd} > > > > src/virtio-scsi.c | 5 +++-- > > src/virtio-scsi.h | 4 ++-- > > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > Hi Asias, > > Thanks for taking the initiative on this, and nice work tracking both of > these stubborn bugs down. > > So with these out of the way, we're good to go for an RFC of Paolo's > vhost-scsi-pci code for upstream QEMU, yes..? > > I'll have some extra bandwidth this week to spend time on the RFC if > you'd like, otherwise I'm happy with you making the upstream QEMU push > for Paolo's code. > > Whatever works best for you. :) Nice, Nicholas, go ahead. I have sent out the WIP V3 for you ;-) > Thank you, > > --nab > > > -- Asias