From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
To: mdroth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, aliguori@us.ibm.com,
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu-ga: use key-value store to avoid recycling fd handles after restart
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 14:24:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130321142456.342813d2@doriath> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130321161313.GG1580@vm>
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 11:13:13 -0500
mdroth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > Looks like you guys have no *practical* problems to solve. Congrats!
> > Take a vacation! Please report back no later than 275 years from now,
> > to make sure this 64 bit fd counter overflow problem gets taken care of
> > in time. ;-P
> >
>
> Haha, well, I didn't want to be that one lazy developer who brings about
> the downfall of future human civilization... but if it's a really big
> deal they'll probably send someone back from the future to let me know,
> so maybe I'm jumping the gun a bit :)
I *am* that guy, but I was afraid to tell :)
> I just didn't want to introduce a new interface that relied on
> interfaces that were planned for deprecation in the *long*-term, but i
> think you're right, it's too much hassle for current users for too
> little gain, and there's plenty of time to do it in the future so I'll
> hold off on it for now.
Let me clarify it: when I read the code I didn't realize fd_counter
would never wrap. I think this discussion is settled now. However, I
still think that having an assert there is good practice.
I can post a patch myself.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-21 18:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-01 17:40 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu-ga: use key-value store to avoid recycling fd handles after restart Michael Roth
2013-03-05 22:57 ` mdroth
2013-03-20 14:54 ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-03-20 16:03 ` mdroth
2013-03-20 16:58 ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-03-20 17:26 ` mdroth
2013-03-20 17:40 ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-03-20 18:14 ` mdroth
2013-03-20 18:38 ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-03-20 19:39 ` mdroth
2013-03-20 19:56 ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-03-20 21:15 ` mdroth
2013-03-21 7:03 ` Markus Armbruster
2013-03-21 16:13 ` mdroth
2013-03-21 18:24 ` Luiz Capitulino [this message]
2013-03-21 18:35 ` mdroth
2013-03-21 19:43 ` Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130321142456.342813d2@doriath \
--to=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).