From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49419) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UK9hq-0005Vy-Md for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 11:53:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UK9hl-0002mP-UE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 11:53:06 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:44497) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UK9hl-0002mH-Mt for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 11:53:01 -0400 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r2PFr0pi016815 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 11:53:01 -0400 Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 11:52:59 -0400 From: Luiz Capitulino Message-ID: <20130325115259.09c66f72@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <51503DC3.6070800@redhat.com> References: <20130321085103.6c684e1a@doriath> <51503DC3.6070800@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Introduce query-cpu-max QMP command and cpu_max HMP counterpart List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Michal Novotny Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 13:06:27 +0100 Michal Novotny wrote: > > On 03/21/2013 01:51 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 17:03:31 +0100 > > Michal Novotny wrote: > > > >> This is the patch to introduce the query-cpu-max QMP command to get > >> the maximum number of CPUs supported by the currently running emulator > >> instance. This may differ machine from machine as defined by -machine > >> settings and max_cpus member of QEMUMachine structure. > >> > >> It's been tested both using QMP/qmp utility and telnet session on > >> the QEMU session. > > Patch looks good, but it doesn't build. See below. > > Thanks! I've rebased but I don't know why it didn't apply before. I sent > v2 to the list about a minute ago with Markus' comments taken in account > (thanks Markus!). I don't see it. Could you please re-send and CC me?