From: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: qemu list <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] rng backend: open backend in blocking mode
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 11:58:23 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130403062823.GA8995@amit.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874nfpf62k.fsf@codemonkey.ws>
On (Tue) 02 Apr 2013 [07:52:19], Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > On (Mon) 01 Apr 2013 [09:02:46], Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >> Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com> writes:
> >>
> >> > Opening backends in non-blocking mode isn't necessary, we don't do
> >> > anything while waiting for data.
> >> >
> >> > This also excuses us from checking for EAGAIN, which for the default
> >> > random backend, is a very common return error type.
> >>
> >> It's not common... It really shouldn't happen however.
> >
> > EAGAIN is common when a file is opened in non-blocking mode. Needs to
> > be made verbose?
>
> EAGAIN doesn't just happen randomly. It only happens when you read from
> an fd when no data is present. Normally, that is something that is
> predictable.
When we open /dev/random as the default backend, we should expect more
EAGAINs than data :-) i.e. /dev/random blocks, we know it.
> >> > backends/rng-random.c:44:entropy_available: assertion failed: (len != -1)
> >> >
> >> > without this fix.
> >>
> >> This fix would cause QEMU to block indefinitely which I don't think is
> >> very good behavior. I think a better solution would be:
How about relegating it to glib functions, and hooking it up so that
/dev/random is polled for data, and this function gets called when
/dev/random has data to give out? Sure, when a read is attempted,
there might be no data available again, but we could then go back to
polling.
Amit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-03 6:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-01 9:25 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] rng backend: open backend in blocking mode Amit Shah
2013-04-01 14:02 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-04-02 10:35 ` Amit Shah
2013-04-02 12:52 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-04-03 6:28 ` Amit Shah [this message]
2013-04-03 20:08 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-04-08 6:09 ` Amit Shah
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130403062823.GA8995@amit.redhat.com \
--to=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).