From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Wenchao Xia <xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, dietmar@proxmox.com,
stefanha@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] block: change rollback sequence in qmp_transaction
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 11:03:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130403090351.GB2854@dhcp-200-207.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <515BBFB2.2000406@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Am 03.04.2013 um 07:35 hat Wenchao Xia geschrieben:
> 于 2013-4-2 21:59, Kevin Wolf 写道:
> >Am 01.04.2013 um 12:01 hat Wenchao Xia geschrieben:
> >> Last operaton should be cancelled first.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Wenchao Xia <xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >
> >Should it? This commit message does little to convince me.
> >
> >Kevin
> >
> I think so, if two request are "snapshot_blkdev ide0 newimage.qcow2",
> "snapshot_blkdev_internal ide0 snap0", then in rollback delete of
> snap0 would be wrong.
I think this problem exists only because you didn't properly separate
the prepare and the commit stage. If any changes only took effect in a
non-failing commit stage, then you don't ever have to delete a snapshot.
Instead, you just abort the creation of the snapshot.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-03 9:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-01 10:01 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] block: make qmp_transaction extendable Wenchao Xia
2013-04-01 10:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] block: add function deappend() Wenchao Xia
2013-04-01 10:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] block: adjust qmp_transaction to be extendable Wenchao Xia
2013-04-02 13:55 ` Kevin Wolf
2013-04-03 5:51 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-04-03 7:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-04-03 9:02 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-04-03 9:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-04-03 9:22 ` Kevin Wolf
2013-04-03 10:33 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-04-17 14:42 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-04-18 3:00 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-04-18 6:35 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-04-01 10:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] block: change rollback sequence in qmp_transaction Wenchao Xia
2013-04-01 15:52 ` Eric Blake
2013-04-02 2:34 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-04-02 13:59 ` Kevin Wolf
2013-04-03 5:35 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-04-03 9:03 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2013-04-03 10:35 ` Wenchao Xia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130403090351.GB2854@dhcp-200-207.str.redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=dietmar@proxmox.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).