From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36418) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPTXo-0004zi-0g for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 04:04:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPTXm-00039D-OU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 04:04:43 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:57266) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPTXm-000391-HV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 04:04:42 -0400 Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 10:04:38 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf Message-ID: <20130409080438.GA2922@dhcp-200-207.str.redhat.com> References: <1365190076-20268-1-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com> <20130408160319.GE22660@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> <5162EDD2.1030304@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5162EDD2.1030304@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] block: Vectored bdrv_writev_vmstate List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com Am 08.04.2013 um 18:18 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben: > Il 08/04/2013 18:03, Stefan Hajnoczi ha scritto: > > Looks fine on the block side. Perhaps Orit, Juan, or Paolo can > > double-check the migration side. > > > > Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi > > Looks good, but given there are patches to fix it, I'm not sure it's > worth the trouble... Shouldn't this perform even a little better? And we should get rid of non-vectored interfaces in the block layer anyway. Kevin