From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
To: Michal Novotny <minovotn@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] New cpu-max field in query-machines QMP command output
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 09:42:45 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130409094245.47ac1ab6@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51641889.6010905@redhat.com>
On Tue, 09 Apr 2013 15:32:57 +0200
Michal Novotny <minovotn@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 04/09/2013 03:15 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Tue, 09 Apr 2013 15:09:21 +0200
> > Michal Novotny <minovotn@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 04/09/2013 03:06 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 08 Apr 2013 11:14:32 -0600
> >>> Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 04/08/2013 10:41 AM, Michal Novotny wrote:
> >>>>> Alter the query-machines QMP command to output information about
> >>>>> maximum number of CPUs for each machine type with default value
> >>>>> set to 1 in case the number of max_cpus is not set.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Michal Novotny <minovotn@redhat.com>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>> qapi-schema.json | 4 +++-
> >>>>> vl.c | 1 +
> >>>>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> diff --git a/qapi-schema.json b/qapi-schema.json
> >>>>> index db542f6..689ca8d 100644
> >>>>> --- a/qapi-schema.json
> >>>>> +++ b/qapi-schema.json
> >>>>> @@ -2861,11 +2861,13 @@
> >>>>> #
> >>>>> # @default: #optional whether the machine is default
> >>>>> #
> >>>>> +# @cpu-max: maximum number of CPUs supported by the machine type
> >>>> Typically, when adding a field in a later version than the original
> >>>> introduction of the datatype, we add '(since 1.5)' to make it obvious
> >>>> when to expect the field. However, as nothing (currently) enforces this
> >>>> rule, I think such an addition is minor enough that it wouldn't
> >>>> invalidate the use of my:
> >>> Oh, it turns out I was making some confusion with this patch and
> >>> didn't realize it was extending the query-machines command.
> >>>
> >>> I don't mean there's anything wrong with it, but my question is: doesn't
> >>> this patch invalidates query-cpu-max?
> >> Not really, the query-cpu-max shows maximum number of CPUs supported per
> >> currently running machine (machine type) however the extension to
> >> query-machines shows the maximum number of CPUs supported per each of
> >> the displayed machine types. This usually doesn't matter on x86
> >> architectures however it does matter on ARM, for example, as ARM has
> >> some CPU models supporting up to 4 CPUs (highbank model) whereas most of
> >> the ARM processors does have only one CPU.
> > Can't we eliminate the query-cpu-max command if we extend the
> > query-machines command to show which machine type is in use?
>
> It may be useful as query-cpu-max is showing maximum number of CPUs
> supported per machine type QEMU currently emulates. We don't have to
> know the machine type and look for this number manually in the
> query-machines output if we have query-cpu-max.
QMP is a machine protocol, "manual" in that context is not a problem.
It's actually wanted.
> We would have to both
> know the machine type and look for the number manually to get max-cpu
> count for currently running machine if we get rid of query-cpu-max command.
>
> Whether something will use the value of CPU-max for currently running
> machine (query-cpu-max output) is another question.
What you mean by that? Why are we adding a command if we don't even know
if it's going to be used?
If I remember correctly, it was said that libivrt was asking for this
command. If this is not the case let's drop it, because the command is
bad (ie. this should be done through QOM).
I've applied this patch, but again, if query-cpu-max is not required by
any QMP user, please post patches reverting it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-09 13:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-08 16:41 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] New cpu-max field in query-machines QMP command output Michal Novotny
2013-04-08 16:35 ` [Qemu-devel] Fwd: " Michal Novotny
2013-04-08 17:14 ` [Qemu-devel] " Eric Blake
2013-04-09 13:06 ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-04-09 13:09 ` Michal Novotny
2013-04-09 13:15 ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-04-09 13:32 ` Michal Novotny
2013-04-09 13:42 ` Luiz Capitulino [this message]
2013-04-09 13:59 ` Michal Novotny
2013-04-09 13:15 ` Peter Krempa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130409094245.47ac1ab6@redhat.com \
--to=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=minovotn@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).