From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49322) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPonj-0000d9-2o for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 02:46:37 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPong-00057D-E7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 02:46:35 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:52386) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPonf-00056p-Ni for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 02:46:32 -0400 Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 08:32:55 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20130410053255.GC12777@redhat.com> References: <20130324155153.GA8597@redhat.com> <515F3160.4020007@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <515F3948.40205@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <515F42EE.8060203@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20130409190350.GB8212@redhat.com> <5164BFE3.4040204@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20130410032449.GA12777@redhat.com> <5164EB5F.80403@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5164EB5F.80403@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2] rdma: add a new IB_ACCESS_GIFT flag List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael R. Hines" Cc: Roland Dreier , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" , Yishai Hadas , LKML , Hal Rosenstock , Jason Gunthorpe , Sean Hefty , Christoph Lameter On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:32:31AM -0400, Michael R. Hines wrote: > On 04/09/2013 11:24 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >Which mechanism do you refer to? You patches still seem to pin > >each page in guest memory at some point, which will break all COW. > >In particular any pagemap tricks to detect duplicates on source > >that I suggested won't work. > > Sorry, I mispoke. I'm reffering to dynamic server page registration. > > Of course it does not eliminate pinning - but it does mitigate the > foot print of the VM as a feature that was requested. > > I have implemented it and documented it. > > - Michael Okay, but GIFT is supposed to be used on send side: it's only allowed with local/remote read access, and serves to reduce memory usage on send side. For example, disable zero page detection and look at memory usage on send side before and after migration. Dynamic registration on the receive side is nice but seems completely unrelated ...