From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52302) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1USnUA-0000SN-8U for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 07:58:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1USnU8-0001Vh-5g for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 07:58:42 -0400 Received: from mail-ea0-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:4013:c01::22d]:53708) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1USnU7-0001VU-VG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 07:58:40 -0400 Received: by mail-ea0-f173.google.com with SMTP id k11so1189815eaj.4 for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 04:58:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 13:58:34 +0200 From: "Edgar E. Iglesias" Message-ID: <20130418115833.GJ4915@smtp.vpn> References: <20130418102619.GG4915@smtp.vpn> <516FD2D1.1060403@redhat.com> <20130418110854.GH4915@smtp.vpn> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 0/3] DTC as submodule List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Paolo Bonzini , peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, aliguori@us.ibm.com On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:10:54PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 18 April 2013 12:08, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 01:02:41PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > >> For submodules that do have autoconf-generated scripts in the repository > >> (I think both of them do, in our case), we should trust upstream's > >> configure script. That's what everyone has been testing the git > >> repository with. > > > > I downloaded the qemu-1.4.1 release and looked at the pixman subdir. It > > doesnt come with a generated configure script, but has a autogen.sh script to > > run autoconf itself. My understanding was that, like you say, the user > > shouldn't need to run autoconf to generate configure, it should have been > > provided. Am I missing something? > > Our release notes from when we put pixman in: > http://wiki.qemu.org/ChangeLog/1.3#Build_dependencies > say that you need autoconf if you're using the built in submodule. > I think that's just documentation of the current situation rather > than an explicit decision that it's the right approach, though. Thanks, that explains it. Cheers, Edgar